Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 12, 2018 at 14:51 vote accept jski
Oct 12, 2018 at 14:51
Oct 9, 2018 at 19:47 answer added Confutus timeline score: 0
Oct 1, 2018 at 15:41 comment added Dan Christensen ...What sorts of problems would it solve that are somehow intractable in classical logic?
Oct 1, 2018 at 15:28 comment added Dan Christensen In classical logic, we can make logical inferences about the state of the world at a given instant in time, be it past, present or future. These inferences can only be based only on logical propositions that were, are or will be unambiguously either true or false at that instant. Do we really need to invent a new form of logic, to make inferences about a future state of the world?
Sep 30, 2018 at 7:27 answer added jski timeline score: 1
Sep 29, 2018 at 17:25 answer added Peter Simons timeline score: 3
Sep 29, 2018 at 13:04 comment added Frank Hubeny I added the source to Johannes answer and copied and pasted it. +1 on the question. Welcome to this SE!
Sep 29, 2018 at 13:03 history edited Frank Hubeny CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed the quote and assigned a source
Sep 28, 2018 at 18:33 history edited jski CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 5 characters in body
Sep 28, 2018 at 18:28 comment added jski The summary of Łukasiewicz's views about past, present, and future statements came from: philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/31745/… Based on what I've read, this seems reasonable.
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:54 comment added Mauro ALLEGRANZA The fact that we do not know the truth-value of the above statement does not mean (according to a well-known view) that the statement has a definte truth-value.
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:52 comment added Mauro ALLEGRANZA The topic is Future Contingents and Aristotle and Time and Necessity: The Sea-Battle.
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:50 comment added Mauro ALLEGRANZA You can see "On Detrminism" (1946), into : Jan Lukasiewicz, Selected works, North-Holland (1970)
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:36 comment added Geremia Could you provide some sources/quotes where Łukasiewicz describes his views "on past, present, and future statements"? Perhaps §44 of Łukasiewicz's Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic pp. 151-4? It seems you're asking about absolute vs. hypothetical necessity.
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:10 review First posts
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:53
Sep 28, 2018 at 17:09 history asked jski CC BY-SA 4.0