Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
J D
  • 49.1k
  • 4
  • 36
  • 155
Fixed a type.
Source Link

To clarify, in light of the comment by sdenham: "I feel that adding ‘alleged’ to the question makes it almost meaningless (the answer is, trivially, ‘no’.) If it is merely alleged that a person has committed a murder, we cannot conclude they have killed someone." the question is saying that it has been alleged that qualia don't exist, and asking whether, if the allegation is correct, that would imply that it is meaningless to say that what I call "red" could be what you call "blue".


To clarify, in light of the comment by sdenham: "I feel that adding ‘alleged’ to the question makes it almost meaningless (the answer is, trivially, ‘no’.) If it is merely alleged that a person has committed a murder, we cannot conclude they have killed someone." the question is saying that it has been alleged that qualia don't exist, and asking whether, if the allegation is correct, that would imply that it is meaningless to say that what I call "red" could be what you call "blue".

Bumped by Community user
Edited the title to make the meaning clearer.
Link

Would the alleged nonexistence of qualia imply that it is meaningless to say that what I call "red" could be what you call "blue"?

Added some text.
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading