Timeline for Does frequency of light change in the LIGO interferometer arms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019 at 3:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1166908697911713799 | ||
| Aug 23, 2019 at 7:30 | answer | added | anna v | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 8:45 | answer | added | ProfRob | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 8:16 | answer | added | Gary Godfrey | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 7:03 | history | edited | Jagerber48 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 477 characters in body
|
| Aug 22, 2019 at 6:48 | history | edited | Jagerber48 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Addressing identification of possible duplicate and giving more of my thoughts on the question.
|
| Aug 22, 2019 at 6:10 | comment | added | Jagerber48 | @G.Smith Thank you for the links. Neither of these answers my question (which is stated as the title.) The stack exchange question seems to assume the frequency of light is not changed by the gravitational wave without any comment about it. I have also been reading the AAPT article you sent. It has some nice discussion that seems relevant to my question but there is no direct discussion of the frequency of light. The conversion from pulses to CW light is made at the end of sec II but it looks like the frequency of light is assumed to be the same in both arms to get the formula for the phase. | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 4:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 29, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
| Aug 22, 2019 at 3:59 | comment | added | G. Smith | See aapt.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1119/1.18578 | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 3:57 | comment | added | G. Smith | Possible duplicate of LIGO flawed by the identical expansion of laser wavelength and arms in presence of a gravitational wave? | |
| Aug 22, 2019 at 3:14 | history | asked | Jagerber48 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |