Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • $\begingroup$ So if I calculated the speed of particle after the radius has been reduced down to 0.5 it would turn out to be $2v$, where $v$ is the original speed? Is there a formula that I can use? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2020 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ @user55 I have modified my answer to accommodate your comment. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2020 at 9:51
  • $\begingroup$ Actually I was thinking about a formula that doesn't use the conservation of angular momentum. The conservation rule is great because it simplifies the calculations, but I was thinking how much more complicated it would be if I were to calculate the new speed without refering to the law of conservation ofangular momentum and calculating the force component parallel to the velocity vector. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2020 at 10:18
  • $\begingroup$ @user5539357 you can ask a separate question for that. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2020 at 10:31
  • $\begingroup$ So the extra kinetic energy comes from the work being done by that force? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2024 at 12:14