Timeline for What does the operator's explicit dependence or independence on time actually mean in Quantum mechanics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2022 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhysics/status/1560280376886661120 | ||
| Jun 4, 2020 at 16:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 28, 2020 at 6:44 | comment | added | raf | I am still looking for an answer! But I don't know how to reask and request here! | |
| Mar 22, 2020 at 18:34 | history | edited | DanielSank | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 136 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2020 at 18:24 | history | reopened |
Albatross Qmechanic♦ |
||
| Mar 22, 2020 at 18:23 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 191 characters in body
|
| Mar 22, 2020 at 3:05 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Mar 22, 2020 at 18:25 | |||||
| Mar 16, 2020 at 16:44 | history | edited | raf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
| Mar 16, 2020 at 16:33 | history | edited | raf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 330 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 16, 2020 at 16:27 | history | edited | raf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 330 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 15, 2020 at 13:49 | comment | added | doublefelix | I think the OP's question is pretty clear: how can an operator, like $-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} $ depend on time? To anyone with the usual math background before QM, they are only used to functions depending on time. And an explicit example of an operator which depends on time is hard to find in the opening chapters of textbooks. So what's the issue with the question? @Qmechanic . I think this is a case where a bit of "putting yourself in the OP's shoes" makes it clear what sort of answer is needed.I don't have the time to write one today, but I don't see why thequestion is closed. | |
| Mar 15, 2020 at 9:09 | comment | added | Roger V. | Sometimes they do explicitly depend on time - e.g., the electric field is often included via time-dependent vector potential. | |
| Mar 15, 2020 at 8:35 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Mar 15, 2020 at 14:41 | |||||
| Mar 15, 2020 at 8:19 | history | edited | raf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 178 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 15, 2020 at 8:07 | comment | added | Charles Francis | I think you may be confusing an observable operator on Hilbert space, e.g. $X$, with the result of the observation on a state. Typically (in the Schrodinger picture) the state is changing in time, but the operator is not. | |
| Mar 15, 2020 at 8:03 | history | closed | Qmechanic♦ | Needs details or clarity | |
| Mar 15, 2020 at 7:32 | history | edited | Qmechanic♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 15, 2020 at 7:12 | history | edited | raf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 15, 2020 at 7:00 | history | asked | raf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |