Timeline for answer to Why are Democrats fighting so hard to vaccinate the reluctant? by Owen Reynolds
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2021 at 2:40 | comment | added | Winston Ewert | I tend to read a lot of different answers on questions that interest me because I believe the truth is best uncovered by considering many different viewpoints. But I really think you should have said "until the next midterm" because to me the current text comes across as you simply not understanding how votes and seats are allocated. | |
| Jul 19, 2021 at 21:58 | comment | added | Owen Reynolds | @WinstonEwert I thought about adding that ("...until the next census") but remembered we recently had Q's here about seat loss/gain in the 2020 census; and 4 Western states only have 1 Rep anyway; and 50% COVID deaths is way, way high and guessing the actual % is way out-of-scope and ghastly; and the para above it was the main point anyway and shouldn't be overshadowed. I'm just glad someone scrolled down to, what, the 9th answer to this Q? | |
| Jul 19, 2021 at 19:34 | comment | added | Winston Ewert | @XiongChiamiov, this is true, and if that's what the answer intends to say, it should be explicit about it. | |
| Jul 19, 2021 at 16:02 | comment | added | Xiong Chiamiov | @WinstonEwert That's only true in another decade, after the next census. | |
| Jul 19, 2021 at 15:35 | comment | added | Winston Ewert | If half of the red state's population died, they'd get a lot less electoral votes and congresspeople. I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but what you do say is just wrong. | |
| Jul 17, 2021 at 4:47 | history | answered | Owen Reynolds | CC BY-SA 4.0 |