Timeline for What are the legal implications of notifying a state before cross-border military action?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30 at 8:13 | comment | added | phoog | In addition, under the traditional laws of war, a surprise attack is a crime unless a state of declared war already exists. | |
| May 28 at 4:44 | vote | accept | user366312 | ||
| May 30 at 13:39 | |||||
| May 19 at 11:43 | comment | added | user13964273 | Usually it is the military target that gets evacuated on warning, not civilians around. Unlike civilian facilities military ones are designed to be mobile. | |
| May 18 at 17:22 | vote | accept | user366312 | ||
| May 20 at 4:28 | |||||
| May 18 at 16:32 | comment | added | Emil Jeřábek | The first reason seems most important. Presumably India didn't want to elicit a panicked nuclear response. | |
| May 18 at 13:23 | history | answered | o.m. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |