Skip to main content
Politics

Return to Question

Post Timeline

Grammatical changes
Source Link
Fred
Fred
  • 1.1k
  • 7
  • 18

According to Article 4 of CSTO

If one of the Member States undergoes aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty), it will be considered by the Member States as aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to all the Member States of this Treaty.

In case of aggression commission (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to any of the Member States, all the other Member States at request of this Member State shall immediately provide the latter with the necessary help, including military one, as well as provide support by the means at their disposal in accordance with the right to collective defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN Charter.

So, During the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War (in whichwhich Azerbaijan won), Hashave any of the CSTO members given an official reason for not following what's laid down in theory  ? What were the practical constraints in providing military aid to Armenia (for Russia especially)?

According to Article 4 of CSTO

If one of the Member States undergoes aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty), it will be considered by the Member States as aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to all the Member States of this Treaty.

In case of aggression commission (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to any of the Member States, all the other Member States at request of this Member State shall immediately provide the latter with the necessary help, including military one, as well as provide support by the means at their disposal in accordance with the right to collective defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN Charter.

So, During Second Nagorno-Karabakh War (in which Azerbaijan won), Has any of CSTO members given official reason for not following what's laid down in theory  ? What were the practical constraints in providing military aid to Armenia (for Russia especially)?

According to Article 4 of CSTO

If one of the Member States undergoes aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty), it will be considered by the Member States as aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to all the Member States of this Treaty.

In case of aggression commission (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to any of the Member States, all the other Member States at request of this Member State shall immediately provide the latter with the necessary help, including military one, as well as provide support by the means at their disposal in accordance with the right to collective defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN Charter.

So, During the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War (which Azerbaijan won), have any of the CSTO members given an official reason for not following what's laid down in theory? What were the practical constraints in providing military aid to Armenia (for Russia especially)?

Fix grammar in title
Link
edit approved Apr 23 at 9:56
Greg Askew
edit approved Apr 23 at 9:56
Greg Askew
  • 851
  • 3
  • 10

Why did not CSTO nations not help Armenia with armed forces in war with Azerbaijan?

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
user68246
user68246

Why did not CSTO nations help Armenia with armed forces in war with Azerbaijan

According to Article 4 of CSTO

If one of the Member States undergoes aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty), it will be considered by the Member States as aggression (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to all the Member States of this Treaty.

In case of aggression commission (armed attack menacing to safety, stability, territorial integrity and sovereignty) to any of the Member States, all the other Member States at request of this Member State shall immediately provide the latter with the necessary help, including military one, as well as provide support by the means at their disposal in accordance with the right to collective defence pursuant to article 51 of the UN Charter.

So, During Second Nagorno-Karabakh War (in which Azerbaijan won), Has any of CSTO members given official reason for not following what's laid down in theory ? What were the practical constraints in providing military aid to Armenia (for Russia especially)?