Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
2 days ago comment added Therac @user111403 That was largely the intent: to make only top naval powers able to declare blockades. Iran is basically rewriting the law more than interpreting it.
2 days ago comment added user111403 Clear enough, thanks for the edit. In practice though it seems like this means one can only impose a blockade at the point of destination, rather than the point of departure. Which, cynically, one might say is rather convenient for a handful of powerful countries.
2 days ago comment added Therac @user111403 Attacking Israeli and US ships is completely legal. But Iran is extending the threat to ships which have merely done trade with Israel in the past.
2 days ago history edited Therac CC BY-SA 4.0
added 9 characters in body
2 days ago comment added user111403 Why exactly would it be illegal for Iran to attack Israeli and aligned ships transiting the strait, but legal for the US to attack ships coming to/from Iran? Israel is hardly a neutral country.
2 days ago history edited Therac CC BY-SA 4.0
added 68 characters in body
2 days ago history answered Therac CC BY-SA 4.0