No difference between using short and long intervals for distributed proficiency-based laparoscopy simulator training: a randomized trial
- PMID: 37993677
- PMCID: PMC10776690
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10522-y
No difference between using short and long intervals for distributed proficiency-based laparoscopy simulator training: a randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Simulation-based training is increasingly used to acquire basic laparoscopic skills. Multiple factors can influence training, e.g., distributed practice is superior to massed practice in terms of efficiency. However, the optimal interval between training sessions is unclear. The objective of this trial was to investigate if shorter intervals between sessions are more efficient than longer intervals during proficiency-based laparoscopy simulator training.
Methods: A randomized simulation-based trial where medical students (n = 39) were randomized to proficiency-based training with either 1-2 days (intervention group) or 6-8 days (control group) between training sessions. Both groups practiced a series of basic tasks and a procedural module until proficiency level on the LapSim® simulator. Both groups were given instructor feedback upon request. After reaching proficiency, participants were invited back for a retention test 3-5 weeks later and practiced the same tasks to proficiency again.
Results: The mean time to reach proficiency during training was 291 (SD 89) and 299 (SD 89) min in the intervention and control group, respectively (p = 0.81). During the retention test, the mean time to reach proficiency was 94 (SD 53) and 96 (SD 39) minutes in the intervention and control groups, respectively (p = 0.91).
Conclusion: We found no difference whether practicing with shorter intervals or longer intervals between training sessions when examining time to proficiency or retention.
Keywords: Distributed; Laparoscopy; Massed; Proficiency; Simulation; Spaced; Training.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Diana Hai Yen Tang, Theresa Bruun Østdal, Anishan Vamadevan, Morten Stadeager, Kim Houlind, Lars Konge, and Flemming Bjerrum have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Variable practice is superior to self-directed training for laparoscopic simulator training: a randomized trial.Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1902-1911. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10688-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38321334 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of instructor feedback on skills retention after laparoscopic simulator training: follow-up of a randomized trial.J Surg Educ. 2015 Jan-Feb;72(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Aug 16. J Surg Educ. 2015. PMID: 25139606 Clinical Trial.
-
Haptic simulators accelerate laparoscopic simulator training, but skills are not transferable to a non-haptic simulator: a randomized trial.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):200-208. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09422-4. Epub 2022 Aug 2. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 35918547 Clinical Trial.
-
Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4):B5335. Dan Med J. 2017. PMID: 28385174 Review.
-
Systematic Review of Virtual Haptics in Surgical Simulation: A Valid Educational Tool?J Surg Educ. 2020 Mar-Apr;77(2):337-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 26. J Surg Educ. 2020. PMID: 31564519
Cited by
-
Distributed training vs. massed practice for surgical skills training-a systematic review.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):39-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11408-3. Epub 2024 Nov 25. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39586877
-
Variable practice is superior to self-directed training for laparoscopic simulator training: a randomized trial.Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1902-1911. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10688-z. Epub 2024 Feb 6. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38321334 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized controlled trial of the CMR immersive virtual reality (IVR) headset training compared to e-learning for operating room configuration of the CMR versius robot.J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 30;18(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01885-y. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38554218 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Examining the learning curves in robotic cardiac surgery wet lab simulation training.Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Dec 25;40(1):ivae227. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae227. Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 39786456 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources