A Guide to an Effective Peer Review
- PMID: 41322173
- PMCID: PMC12658579
- DOI: 10.24908/pocusj.v10i02.20046
A Guide to an Effective Peer Review
Abstract
Peer review is a fundamental element of the modern scientific publishing process. It serves an important role in evaluating the quality of research and refining submitted manuscripts into accurate and impactful contributions to the existing scientific literature. Over the last two decades, opportunities for publication have skyrocketed, and the demand for peer reviewers has grown exponentially. Although the peer review process provides significant benefits, recruiting individuals as peer reviewers can be challenging. The most common obstacles include the time commitment needed to provide meaningful reviews and uncertainty about how to prepare a cohesive and beneficial peer review. This article offers prospective peer reviewers structured guidance to build confidence and enable them to perform effective reviews.
Keywords: Critical appraisal; Manuscript evaluation; Peer review; Reviewer guidance; Scientific publishing.
Copyright (c) 2025 Tanping Wong, Riya Soni, Casey Glass.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
References
-
- Drozdz JA, Ladomery MR. The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future. Br J Biomed Sci 2024;17;81:12054. doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.12054. - DOI
-
- Evans AT, McNutt RA, Fletcher SW, Fletcher RH. The Characteristics of Peer Reviewers Who Produce Good-quality Reviews. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:422–428. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources