Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • $\begingroup$ General: It's not THAT horrible and relative quick to prove. Let the counter sides be 16,25,34. Then $t1*t3*t4-t2*t3*t4-t1*t2*t5+t2*t3*t5+t2*t4*t5-t3*t4*t5+t1*t2*t6-t1*t3*t6-t1*t4*t6+t3*t4*t6+t1*t5*t6-t2*t5*t6=0$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14 at 18:33
  • $\begingroup$ Partial answer to bonus: I'm stoopid. Since virtually all of my equations I ever encountered in my recreational math are homogenous, I also assumed these are. They aren't. Which means than any "accidental" rational solution can be scaled. One of the 6 solutions happens to be always rational (regardless of the wurzelrider), the rest of the solution way is routine. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19 at 15:06