Unless People Support Me, Trump Habitually Warns, 'We Won't Have a Country Anymore'
The president's predictions of the nation's imminent demise reflect his narcissistic authoritarianism.
The president's predictions of the nation's imminent demise reflect his narcissistic authoritarianism.
Foreign Law in American Courts
holds a federal court in declining to enforce the Beijing judgment, and in therefore concluding that Stanford holds title to documents donated to the Hoover Institution by a Chinese Mao-era dissident.
It argues that the right to use property is central to both the value of property rights generally, and the property rights protected by the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
But only if politicians learn to focus on the boring basics of aviation policy.
Understanding the stakes in Trump v. Barbara.
A court sets aside a federal arson conviction (which would have carried a "mandatory minimum sentence" of "seven years") for a fan's throwing flares at a soccer stadium and causing minor damage and a minor injury.
The jurors concluded that the officers violated the Fourth and 14th amendments when they seized a 14-year-old without evidence that she was in danger.
How America's old-age entitlement system became a sprawling lifestyle-subsidy program that steals from the poor to give to the rich.
A war by any other name must still be authorized by Congress.
Plus: the Facebook verdicts, porn star chatbots, facial recognition gone awry, drag queen regulation, and more…
Tantaros is representing herself in a lawsuit against Fox and, among others, ex-Senator Scott Brown, alleging sexual harassment and other claims.
The case could give the Court a chance to clarify what a "closely regulated" business is and what constitutional protections it enjoys.
Two different pieces of legislation aim to create state workarounds to the procedural quagmire of federal civil rights litigation.
Not the misconduct itself, but noted in the court's opinion as one of the items plaintiff had sought to withhold from discovery: "During a separate text conversation on May 11, 2018, Plaintiff texted Mr. Roe: 'If I had 5 dollars for every gender, I would have 5 dollars coz women are objects.'"
Rep. Jimmy Panetta says Democrats have "learned the hard way" that handing over so much tariff authority to the executive branch is a bad idea.
The president is much less concerned about the law's potential for overreach now that he's in charge of the government wielding it.
Tech journalist Taylor Lorenz discusses the Meta trial, the moral panic around social media, and the risks of regulating online speech.
Plus: a pause on power plant bombing, an executive order to fund the TSA, a tentative plan to end the DHS shutdown, and more…
Education freedom is under attack, including baseless accusations.
Lawmakers used to offset its emergency spending. They don't anymore.
The ability to get home should not be a privilege contingent on the political moment.
This heavy-handed legislation would harm Americans, not protect them.
Plus: Meta and Google found liable, what the verdict means, an OnlyFans-style campaign website, and more...
Plus: What George Orwell thought about Friedrich Hayek.
I submitted some additional testimony to a House subcommittee, in response to questions from Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon.
But "evidence related to his political activities, attendance at Burning Man in 2017, and relationship with Shivon Zilis" will be allowed.
"It appears that the Court’s prior admonitions and sanctions have had little, if any, remedial impact."
Meta's loss in a New Mexico "product design" case could also be a blow against Section 230, free speech, and online privacy.
The president and his new DHS secretary are enraged by jurists and legislators who refuse to toe the party line.
With the Pentagon's track record, lawmakers are right to be skeptical.
with cameo appearance by out-of-jurisdiction counsel's citation of non-existent cases.
The lawsuit alleges that the city has a history of silencing pro-Palestine speech.
From Korea to Iran, the United States has employed countless euphemisms that not only obscure the true nature of its wars but also the constitutional limits designed to constrain them.
What’s at stake in Watson v. Republican National Committee.
The court's reasoning mostly turns on a conclusion that much of the prison behavior that plaintiffs complained about wasn't dictated by that particular law.
From a termination of parental rights decision by the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Hochul invited those who opposed her policies to leave. Many did. Now she wants them back.
No single government controls the South Pole, so how do they deal with crime?
The Trump administration wants its federal funding back from Harvard, alleging the Ivy League university did "nothing" about campus antisemitism.
“Officers don’t have the blanket authority to arrest anyone who runs from them,” says an attorney from the Institute for Justice.
The president says federal courts should not make decisions based on partisan considerations unless it benefits him.
California initiatives will fuel an already fiery November election, and the state's top-two primary might end up excluding Democrats in the governor's race.
His work further demonstrates that the AEA cannot be used in response to illegal migration or drug smuggling, but only when there is a military attack.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks