Skip to main content
added 98 characters in body
Source Link
Trish
  • 53.3k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 40

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnddnd[-playtest] is just the next evolution of it on the way to or whatever they will assign as the next edition's name. So we should give it (or its playtest) its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&DD&D[-playtest] questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it on the way to . So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd[-playtest] is the next evolution of it on the way to or whatever they will assign as the next edition's name. So we should give it (or its playtest) its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D[-playtest] questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
V2Blast StaffMod
  • 51.2k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 51

is not necessarily

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it on the way to . So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it on the way to . So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it on the way to . So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

added 133 characters in body
Source Link
Trish
  • 53.3k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 40

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it on the way to . So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have anyeither or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it. So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have any or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

is not necessarily

We have a few old questions, which became eventually. The systems used in both were quite different at times. one-dnd is just the next evolution of it on the way to . So we give it its own tag.

In fact, I bet that in the future often the One-D&D questions should not have either or tag, as they are an ecosystem on their own, even if in flux and development. Once we have a sufficient... branch from the previous edition, we also shouldn't tag it that way!

added 132 characters in body
Source Link
Trish
  • 53.3k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 40
Loading
Source Link
Trish
  • 53.3k
  • 1
  • 19
  • 40
Loading