Skip to main content
added 82 characters in body
Source Link
nitsua60 Mod
  • 103.7k
  • 61
  • 153

For a while now, we've had answers like these ones which fail to really answer the question on their own, but just add some extra information building on other pre-existing answers. They often even say as much: "This other answer already covers everything, so let me talk about some tangential extra stuff". They're consistently from users at least moderately experienced with our site, too.

I have an expectation that answers should always independently answer the question, such that if that's the only answer that exists, it should still make sense and the question should still be considered answered.

Because of this, I've been consistently downvoting these answers and leaving comments requesting that these people actually answer the question, and then provide the tangential stuff they want to - even if it's just a brief sentence or two and a link if they want to credit another answer.

Should I be doing this? Is there a better way to handle this?


Return to FAQ Index

For a while now, we've had answers like these ones which fail to really answer the question on their own, but just add some extra information building on other pre-existing answers. They often even say as much: "This other answer already covers everything, so let me talk about some tangential extra stuff". They're consistently from users at least moderately experienced with our site, too.

I have an expectation that answers should always independently answer the question, such that if that's the only answer that exists, it should still make sense and the question should still be considered answered.

Because of this, I've been consistently downvoting these answers and leaving comments requesting that these people actually answer the question, and then provide the tangential stuff they want to - even if it's just a brief sentence or two and a link if they want to credit another answer.

Should I be doing this? Is there a better way to handle this?

For a while now, we've had answers like these ones which fail to really answer the question on their own, but just add some extra information building on other pre-existing answers. They often even say as much: "This other answer already covers everything, so let me talk about some tangential extra stuff". They're consistently from users at least moderately experienced with our site, too.

I have an expectation that answers should always independently answer the question, such that if that's the only answer that exists, it should still make sense and the question should still be considered answered.

Because of this, I've been consistently downvoting these answers and leaving comments requesting that these people actually answer the question, and then provide the tangential stuff they want to - even if it's just a brief sentence or two and a link if they want to credit another answer.

Should I be doing this? Is there a better way to handle this?


Return to FAQ Index

replaced http://rpg.stackexchange.com/ with https://rpg.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

For a while now, we've had answers likelike thesethese onesones which fail to really answer the question on their own, but just add some extra information building on other pre-existing answers. They often even say as much: "This other answer already covers everything, so let me talk about some tangential extra stuff". They're consistently from users at least moderately experienced with our site, too.

I have an expectation that answers should always independently answer the question, such that if that's the only answer that exists, it should still make sense and the question should still be considered answered.

Because of this, I've been consistently downvoting these answers and leaving comments requesting that these people actually answer the question, and then provide the tangential stuff they want to - even if it's just a brief sentence or two and a link if they want to credit another answer.

Should I be doing this? Is there a better way to handle this?

For a while now, we've had answers like these ones which fail to really answer the question on their own, but just add some extra information building on other pre-existing answers. They often even say as much: "This other answer already covers everything, so let me talk about some tangential extra stuff". They're consistently from users at least moderately experienced with our site, too.

I have an expectation that answers should always independently answer the question, such that if that's the only answer that exists, it should still make sense and the question should still be considered answered.

Because of this, I've been consistently downvoting these answers and leaving comments requesting that these people actually answer the question, and then provide the tangential stuff they want to - even if it's just a brief sentence or two and a link if they want to credit another answer.

Should I be doing this? Is there a better way to handle this?

For a while now, we've had answers like these ones which fail to really answer the question on their own, but just add some extra information building on other pre-existing answers. They often even say as much: "This other answer already covers everything, so let me talk about some tangential extra stuff". They're consistently from users at least moderately experienced with our site, too.

I have an expectation that answers should always independently answer the question, such that if that's the only answer that exists, it should still make sense and the question should still be considered answered.

Because of this, I've been consistently downvoting these answers and leaving comments requesting that these people actually answer the question, and then provide the tangential stuff they want to - even if it's just a brief sentence or two and a link if they want to credit another answer.

Should I be doing this? Is there a better way to handle this?

edited tags
Link
SevenSidedDie Mod
  • 246k
  • 4
  • 145
  • 378
edited tags
Link
doppelgreener
  • 36.9k
  • 4
  • 175
  • 374
Loading
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackRPG/status/437628019633831936
added 85 characters in body
Source Link
doppelgreener
  • 36.9k
  • 4
  • 175
  • 374
Loading
Source Link
doppelgreener
  • 36.9k
  • 4
  • 175
  • 374
Loading