Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for your answer! Unfornately, Im not sure if you are right. Do you have any other supporting evidence? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 11:59
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ @Elmo I have added a tweet from Jeremy Crawford to support this \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 12:01
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @Elmo the feature specifically calls out "the two-handed property", not "used in two hands" or similar \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 12:04
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ While I don't believe that the Crawford tweet is necessary, given your explanation of the versatile property, and the clarity of the rules, giving amplifying information where the answer is still unclear to the asker is a nice example of going the extra mile. :) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 12:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KorvinStarmast My DM might have another opinion. I just wanted to be sure. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 5, 2018 at 17:31