Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • \$\begingroup\$ There's this nebulous thing for me, though, in that the rules state the item has to be a 'melee weapon'. Now there is a sort of definition of melee weapons within the PHB's weapon table and I will concur that rod's aren't on there. But I would also say that you could hit a person with it in a melee fashion. Further complicating the issue is that the Staff of Power is described as a functional melee weapon, so I have to wonder why Rods aren't as well. It may not have any plusses to hit and damage, but you could still hit someone with it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 23, 2018 at 1:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What you're describing is an improvised weapon. They are described on p147 of the Player Handbook. "such as broken glass, a table leg," and it goes on to say "In many cases, an improvised weapon is similar to an actual weapon and can be treated as such. For example, a table leg is akin to a club. At the DM’s option, a character proficient with a weapon can use a similar object as if it w ere that weapon and use his or her proficiency bonus." But they still are not a melee (or other) Weapon as far as the rules are concerned. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 23, 2018 at 1:55
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Revised to flip, but I've added some additional info that will be helpful for the querent. Just find yourself a Staff of the Magi and you are set! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 23, 2018 at 2:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Pyrotechnical, thanks, but the reason I asked because the build is for specifically a Warlock. And a SOM might be a bit much for what I intend. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 23, 2018 at 4:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ @JhyarelleSilver the answer to your question is still herein. This is more information than you require and might be useful for later. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 23, 2018 at 13:16