Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ But both features clearly state that you ignore "class" requirements, and that could be taken as ignoring "Warlock" in the text of the item. It's similar to how one may (or may not) be able to benefit from a Holy Avenger's 30-foot aura. Are you implying that an Artificer or Thief Rogue could never benefit from the 30-foot aura? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 19, 2020 at 13:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ I agree with this answer, and also with the addendum: they wouldn't benefit from the 30ft aura from a Holy Avenger \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 15:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ Since you don't think they can benefit from either, do you think an Artificer or Thief Rogue be able to use a Wheel of Wind and Water? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 12:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ Technically it is possible (via feat) to have access to warlock spells without any warlock class levels. I believe in that case, the thief rogue or artificer would be able to use a Rod of the Pact Keeper to buff their feat-derived warlock spells, while, say, a rogue with that feat would not. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 7, 2020 at 18:11