Skip to main content
Role-playing Games

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • \$\begingroup\$ Basically perfect answer. Did you mean “hold” in the clause “… don't need to spend your free object interaction to carry it.“? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 8 at 16:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @nonymous Thank you. The question was „do I need to use an free object interaction or utilize action to go from wearing it to carrying it?“ (they are wearing it to have the hands free). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 8 at 17:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Upvoted, because I agree, but this seems like a very long explanation given the rather simple answer (in bold)! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 9 at 8:00
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @DaniO'Shea Thank you \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 9 at 9:10
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ At least for "holding or carrying", it does add a little to include "holding or". If the item is affixed to something else, something immobile, or simply too big to be carried, I'd say you're still satisfying the requirements by merely gripping it, even if you're unable to carry it in any meaningful sense. Coming up with a case where "worn" isn't a subset of "carried" is harder, but they likely included it simply because, while technically you carry anything you wear, it's awkward/non-idiomatic to refer to "carrying a shirt" or the like rather than wearing it, even if it is technically both. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 10 at 15:42