Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • \$\begingroup\$ Interesting. Yeah, I like mixing in the concept of typecast but it doesn't seem to quite capture the meaning. I am familiar with the different gender portrayal. More focused on personality. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2013 at 2:39
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @LitheOhm By the way, I cited TV Tropes because they usually tell you the mainstream name for their tropes where they exist (e.g., a stable time loop is elsewhere known as the bootstrap paradox). They note that the trope is very common but don't offer a mainstream name, which I take as evidence of absence. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2013 at 2:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ It would seem our closest candidate then comes from acting. At least it's closer than the literary round character. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 24, 2013 at 9:16
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 we use "playing against type" to describe this, it may not be logically correct but... People often play to their personality as their most common type anyway. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 30, 2013 at 21:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ +1, "Playing against type" is the answer that sprang to mind as soon as I read the question title. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 17, 2015 at 3:24