Edit - Information Security Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

Rev

One small note: RG 5.15 is superseded by RG 5.80. It cites 4 modes of attack on seals: substitution, removal and reapplication, alteration of label data, alteration of separately recorded data. Thanks for the ref, I read the Argonne link, but failed to realize the connexion with the NRC regs.

Deer Hunter
– Deer Hunter

2013-07-21 14:56:46 +00:00
Commented Jul 21, 2013 at 14:56
1

@DeerHunter Thanks for the update. I encourage you to read the whole of Johnston's paper. You may ignore his recommended devices and depend on the RG 5.80 for that, but pay close attention to his assessment method.

Adi
– Adi

2013-07-21 16:03:32 +00:00
Commented Jul 21, 2013 at 16:03

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »