Timeline for Why do we use a OS Base Image with Docker if containers have no Guest OS?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2022 at 2:29 | answer | added | Anu | timeline score: -1 | |
| Oct 9, 2020 at 3:28 | answer | added | Mohamed Abdelhady | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Mar 2, 2017 at 19:51 | history | suggested | Craig Tullis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
A little bit of semantic clarification.
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 19:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 2, 2017 at 19:51 | |||||
| Aug 17, 2016 at 18:50 | vote | accept | user1620696 | ||
| Aug 16, 2016 at 16:40 | comment | added | metamorph | In my opinion, your objectives in virtualisation are the keys. If you need libraries, languages, etc. on OS, so OS containers are suitable with your need. But if your need is only application as components, it doesn't necessary to use OS as your base image. I think this article could explain it clearly blog.risingstack.com/… | |
| Jun 17, 2016 at 3:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/ServerFault/status/743650122211393536 | ||
| Jun 16, 2016 at 1:33 | answer | added | Mike | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 17:48 | history | edited | GregL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 11, 2016 at 17:15 | answer | added | drookie | timeline score: 96 | |
| Feb 11, 2016 at 16:39 | history | asked | user1620696 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |