Timeline for Quality of answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 30, 2012 at 22:55 | comment | added | John Lyon | I have to say what you did was the most appropriate thing: None of the answers were sufficient, so you provided one of your own. With the site becoming more popular, it's important that new users see what a good answer looks like. | |
| Apr 28, 2011 at 16:34 | comment | added | DJClayworth | For those coming to this question later, the original answers I was talking about are now heavily downvoted. | |
| Apr 2, 2011 at 21:22 | history | edited | Jason Plank | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added a space
|
| Mar 21, 2011 at 18:37 | answer | added | Borror0Mod | timeline score: 10 | |
| Mar 21, 2011 at 18:33 | comment | added | Mad Scientist Mod | And as a positive counterpoint, we do often get good answers and they are voted up accordingly. It seems to me that most of the upvoting on bad answers happens if there are no other high-quality answers already posted. In those cases the voting does not lead to good results. | |
| Mar 21, 2011 at 18:23 | comment | added | Mad Scientist Mod | I'm not happy with the answers in the example, but there is the additional problem in this specific case that the study in question is not freely available. | |
| Mar 21, 2011 at 18:05 | history | asked | DJClayworth | CC BY-SA 2.5 |