Timeline for "Checking" an already very reliable source
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2020 at 10:53 | comment | added | Kafein | @DJClayworth They are statistically better, yes. But that is still an argument of authority. Everyone can critique a published paper, and that critique can be evaluated on its own merit. | |
| Jul 16, 2020 at 3:48 | comment | added | DJClayworth | As has been said repeatedly, it's not that peer reviewed articles are magic, it's just that they are better than random people on the internet. We are random people on the internet. There are thousands of blog posts out there saying "Here's a common sense argument why climate change is wrong", and one of the purposes of this site is to counteract them. | |
| Jun 11, 2020 at 16:41 | history | answered | Kafein | CC BY-SA 4.0 |