Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:41 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Dec 23, 2019 at 17:24 comment added PoloHoleSet @Chronocidal - It would depend if the pilot managed the controls as they were supposed to or not. FYI - my comment was a tongue-in-cheek "observation."
Dec 23, 2019 at 13:30 comment added Chronocidal @PoloHoleSet If we stuck you in the seat of an F-15, and you crashed the plane, is that the fault of the controls, or the pilot?
Jan 6, 2019 at 13:36 comment added DJClayworth Let's not discuss Pearse's merits here. It's not me 'dismissing' his efforts, it's Scientific American.
Jan 6, 2019 at 12:46 comment added John Dvorak @polo if a gazelle tries to zig zag in order to outrun a cheetah but still gets caught, does it mean the gazelle didn't know how to zig zag?
Jan 3, 2019 at 17:34 comment added PoloHoleSet If the aircraft responded to his control inputs, and it still crashed the plane, I'd dispute whether the controls were successfully functional.
Sep 30, 2015 at 15:43 comment added user18902 I think you dismiss Richard Pearse's efforts too easily. While his controls may have been inadequate to avoid a hedge, they were based on the same principals as modern thinking on the subject. To say that the flight was uncontrolled is not fair, I think. He had control, the aircraft responded to his control inputs.
Jun 21, 2011 at 21:57 vote accept Monkey Tuesday
Jun 21, 2011 at 14:36 history edited DJClayworth CC BY-SA 3.0
scientific american
Jun 21, 2011 at 14:29 history answered DJClayworth CC BY-SA 3.0