Timeline for Should you edit questions which have a moral value statement in it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2017 at 7:31 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://programmers.stackexchange.com/ with https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 16, 2014 at 19:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/478621740654809088 | ||
| Jun 13, 2014 at 11:58 | vote | accept | Pieter B | ||
| Jun 12, 2014 at 10:35 | comment | added | Jon Hanna | Evil has long been programmer slang for something that does harm to a system, process or workflow, that massively outweighs any gain, and while it alludes to moral judgement doesn't necessarily entail one. I don't see much moral judgement in not damaging a users' machine. It's not free of moral judgement, but I think we can reasonably assume that at least attempting to do at least a reasonably good job is a moral baseline for everything here. | |
| Jun 10, 2014 at 11:25 | answer | added | jwenting | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 14:41 | answer | added | DougM | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 7, 2014 at 7:16 | answer | added | Bart van Ingen Schenau | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 6, 2014 at 16:03 | history | edited | gnat |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 6, 2014 at 13:35 | comment | added | gnat | related (not a duplicate): The real borderline for “Opinion based” in Programmers | |
| Jun 6, 2014 at 13:32 | history | edited | user28988 |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 6, 2014 at 13:25 | history | asked | Pieter B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |