Timeline for answer to Avoid using ChatGPT or other AI-powered solutions to generate answers to questions on Software Engineering by Clara
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2023 at 8:25 | comment | added | M. Justin | Using ChatGPT output as an example like this has got to be one of the few "valid" usages of ChatGPT in an answer that doesn't fall under the "highly discouraged" category mentioned in the post… | |
| Dec 13, 2022 at 11:29 | comment | added | Yarek T | True, SE's quality filter is done via votes, reviews and comments. It's irrelevant if an answer is written by AI or not, if its low quality based on collective expertise of all users it should be removed. However, this does just add load to the already full review queue | |
| Dec 11, 2022 at 18:51 | comment | added | Doc Brown | ... Moreover, when we look at this answer, which consists mainly of by ChatGPT content: this answer alone disproves pretty much any of the arguments listed above. | |
| Dec 6, 2022 at 7:02 | comment | added | Doc Brown | I don't know if most chatbot answers fit into this description, but I know for sure sometimes human answers do. When we encounter such answers, it does not matter whether a chatbot or a human wrote them, if the quality is that low, they will be downvoted (and sometimes deleted). | |
| Dec 6, 2022 at 3:33 | comment | added | Thomas Owens Mod | I will say that these are...wrong. These aren't the good indicators or tells of an AI-generated answer, at least something with the kind of training data as ChatGPT. | |
| Dec 6, 2022 at 2:28 | history | answered | Clara | CC BY-SA 4.0 |