Seems like only two banners are offered, neither matches the current policy.
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools are not allowed on [Site Name]. Learn more
Reminder: Answers generated by artificial intelligence tools must be cited on [Site Name]. Learn more
I suggest the policy is modified to allow a degree of flexibility and human judgement.
"Answers must be primarily/substantively/mainly? written by the author"
This allows translations, or examples, or answers about Generative AI where deemed appropriate by humans.
Using the banner seems pointless, will it really stop someone writing a bot that answers questions and is deceptive about it? If a poster is citing their answer as AI generated then it can be deleted easily same as any other rules violation.
I can see why you might want to use a bot to hack a massive SO score, but a SE score?
EDIT -
Example of answers which I think should be allowed, even though they have used GenAI
Questions About AI
Q. How can I stop extra fingers being added to my GAI generated images?
A. you can improve your model with X, here is a before example and[generated pic] and after example [generated pic2]
Here the answer includes GAI generated content but the answer has been created by a human and is useful.
Code examples written by humans with GAI help
Q. Here is an example of a big If statement, how can I refactor more betterer?
A. Big if statements can be replaced with blah here[example written by human using copilot] here are the pros and cons etc etc
Again, here the answer is human written but contains GAI content
GenAI Translation tools used to make answer
Q. in this german paper on software development it says X, but why not Y?
A. on page six it goes into X vs Y and says that [google translated excerpt] ...
Again, human written answer, but made with the help of GAI