Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • 1
    As the question is at the moment, it looks more suited for Code Review, however, since it is not compilable code it is not allowed there. To make the question work better here, and be more than a design review, be sure to add some specific questions you are interested in. Commented Nov 26, 2011 at 15:16
  • I thought about such a site first but had no idea StackExchange had one. I'll keep it in mind for later, thanks! Commented Nov 26, 2011 at 15:28
  • Can you paste the code into the question. Pastebin may not retain the code as long as this question is here. So we need the code on this site to make the questions relevant to the answer. Commented Nov 26, 2011 at 15:41
  • @StevenJeuris: I also think this question would work better on Code Review. I think the question is about reviewing the design of the code so bending the rules is OK in this situation. The spirit of the rule is to prevent people from posting bug fix questions (which belong on stackoverflow). Commented Nov 26, 2011 at 15:44
  • @LokiAstari: Well, the updated question with the two questions at the bottom is very suitable for Programmers in my opinion. If we were to bend the rules and allow not-working code on Code Review the line between Code Review and Programmers wouldn't be that obvious anymore. Commented Nov 26, 2011 at 15:47