Skip to main content
38 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 22, 2012 at 21:06 history notice removed ChrisF
Aug 10, 2012 at 9:40 history closed gnat
Walter
Caleb
CommunityBot
Eric Wilson
not constructive
S Aug 8, 2012 at 19:33 answer added Erik Reppen timeline score: 1
S Aug 8, 2012 at 19:33 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Erik Reppen
Aug 8, 2012 at 18:17 comment added Orcris Learning two languages is nothing. In any given day, I will program in Ruby/Ruby on Rails, C++, C#, and Lisp. Knowing multiple languages is great, and most programmers know four or five.
Aug 8, 2012 at 18:03 answer added luis.espinal timeline score: 2
Aug 8, 2012 at 17:52 comment added luis.espinal Why would someone ask if knowing/using more than one thing is a detrimental practice (specially if said thing requires substantial intellectual effort)?
Aug 8, 2012 at 17:35 history notice added yannis Needs detailed answers
Aug 8, 2012 at 17:10 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackProgrammer/status/233248930299772928
Aug 8, 2012 at 17:00 answer added ist_lion timeline score: 0
Aug 8, 2012 at 16:31 answer added Sarel Botha timeline score: 2
Aug 8, 2012 at 15:44 answer added John Bode timeline score: 5
Aug 8, 2012 at 15:31 comment added Justin ᚅᚔᚈᚄᚒᚔ @scrwtp: Tony the Pony would argue otherwise.
Aug 8, 2012 at 15:09 answer added Maciek Talaska timeline score: 0
Aug 8, 2012 at 14:48 answer added binarycleric timeline score: 2
Aug 8, 2012 at 14:20 comment added Caleb Just two? Many programmers regularly work in a number of languages. Knowing several gives you a larger set of tools to draw from.
Aug 8, 2012 at 14:11 comment added user29079 Knowing all the dirty details of one language is no doubt very useful. But when you work with multiple languages, you will at some point down the road find yourself designing parts of the program in a certain way, regardless of what language you are currently working in. This is a kind of programmer nirvana, where the language becomes secondary and the application is what matters. That is a great place to be, because it means you have potential as a programmer even in the future, when people are working in some new fancy Z++ language.
Aug 8, 2012 at 14:10 comment added Doc Brown @LaminSanneh: most of the projects I work on have already a certain code base in a given language, and even when I start a new project, I am seldom completely free in choosing the language. So, where should be any "wisdom" in doing only C# programming in the future and refusing to do anything else? The company I work for would not be very happy with that, I guess. Is your situation so very different that a question like "shall I do only development in language XYZ in the future" makes any sense for you?
S Aug 8, 2012 at 14:01 history suggested Cloudy CC BY-SA 3.0
Typo/grammar fixes
Aug 8, 2012 at 13:58 comment added Chad Harrison @LaminSanneh What Doc Brown is getting at is he presentation of your question makes it seem that you have the choice to exclusively choose one or the other where most people are required to trudge through multiple languages to accomplish a certain task.
Aug 8, 2012 at 13:54 review Suggested edits
S Aug 8, 2012 at 14:01
Aug 8, 2012 at 13:52 answer added Jon Hanna timeline score: 2
Aug 8, 2012 at 13:24 comment added Lamin Sanneh @Doc brown...I am sorry but I do not understand your question?
Aug 8, 2012 at 13:13 answer added Yusubov timeline score: 14
Aug 8, 2012 at 13:12 answer added Karl Bielefeldt timeline score: 4
Aug 8, 2012 at 12:29 comment added Doc Brown You ask this question as if your were you totally free to choose between C# and PHP - is that really the case?
Aug 8, 2012 at 11:55 answer added Sign timeline score: 2
Aug 8, 2012 at 11:49 answer added jfrankcarr timeline score: 2
S Aug 8, 2012 at 11:05 history suggested mhoran_psprep CC BY-SA 3.0
removed extra word in title
Aug 8, 2012 at 11:01 comment added SK-logic It will certainly harm you if you limit yourself to just two languages. Get more different tools into your toolbox.
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:58 review Suggested edits
S Aug 8, 2012 at 11:05
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:47 comment added Lamin Sanneh @scrwtp. Is that the case even if the one trick pony is much more proficient in his one trick than the jack of all trades is in each of his trades? Just a friendly question.
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:42 answer added Sergey Kalinichenko timeline score: 37
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:38 answer added Konrad Rudolph timeline score: 75
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:35 answer added Deco timeline score: 5
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:32 comment added scrwtp better to be a jack of all trades than a one trick pony
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:28 history edited superM CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed grammar and improved formatting
Aug 8, 2012 at 10:19 history asked Lamin Sanneh CC BY-SA 3.0