Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • Short answer, that's not REST. Commented Jan 23, 2013 at 18:53
  • 3
    @EvanPlaice care to elaborate on that? that's exactly the question. Commented Jan 24, 2013 at 8:23
  • 1
    I would have elaborated in an answer but Gary's answer already covers most/all of what I'd add. I say it's not rest because URIs are only supposed to represent resources (ie not actions). Actions are handled through GET/POST/PUT/DELETE/HEAD. Think of REST as an OOP interface. The goal being to make the API fit the general pattern and decouple it from implementation specific details as possible. Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 0:57
  • 1
    @EvanPlaice Ok I understand, thanks. I think it's confusing here because Deposit could be thought of as a noun and as a verb... Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 6:33
  • In this case the URI should represent a transaction where debiting (taking money) and crediting (giving money) are actions done via POST requests. POST is used for both because each time money is moved in either direction it represents a new transaction being created. In your specific case, the transactions are taking place on a cardholder's account so the card's account number is the resource URI. Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 19:39