Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

10
  • 4
    So in your mind there is no room for someone just being approximate about it because they don't want to waste space having another mark up language section? To me that's pedantry way beyond what's useful. Commented Dec 20, 2010 at 12:08
  • 1
    +1 when i see a CV with HTML/CSS under 'programming', i read no further. either he doesn't know the difference (so he's no use for me), or hopes I don't know the difference (so i don't want to work with him) Commented Dec 20, 2010 at 14:22
  • 2
    @Jon Hopkins: Attention to detail is a necessary quality in a programmer. Putting HTML under programming languages is not being approximate, it is being sloppy. That makes a very bad first impression if you are applying for a job as a programmer. Commented Dec 20, 2010 at 17:03
  • 1
    @Dima: absolutely. informality is ok, sometimes even in writing, imprecision in the very basic concepts of trade is unacceptable. Commented Dec 20, 2010 at 18:09
  • 1
    This is ridiculous. Resumes and interviews are one of the most problematic parts of our industry right now. You never know if someone who knows the difference still puts "HTML" under "Programming Languages" because they are scared some HR drone won't notice it under "markup/design/etc" and kicks out their resume. You should at least call them up or bring them in. If they tell you to your face that they "program in HTML," well... that's really a red flag. But then again, think of what you can accomplish now in HTML 5 alone! Is it really such a stretch? Commented Aug 12, 2011 at 14:04