Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • 4
    I didn't think SQL was Turing-complete, unless you're talking about T-SQL or PL/SQL. Commented Feb 23, 2011 at 18:36
  • @FrustratedWithFormsDesigner: You're right! Thanks for picking me up on that. (However, the point I'm making stands - that declarative languages can be T-C) Commented Mar 3, 2011 at 10:41
  • 1
    Very good answers. As a web-developer I've seen over-and-over again situations where clients' are impressed far more with a "flashy" design than by proposed functionality. Whilst this may offend our purist programmer instincts (that functionality should be king) it is something we ignore at our peril. Commented Aug 12, 2011 at 7:59
  • 5
    +1: Joel Spolsky has an interesting blog post that takes up the problem with function vs flashy GUI. Especially the hazards of showing a 100% finished and very flashy GUI when the functionality is not in place. A good read if you havent read it. joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000356.html Commented Jan 25, 2013 at 8:21
  • 3
    "They might well be more productive with feel-good tools than with technically superior tools" - True, true, true! Apple has built their business on this. Don't get me wrong, Mac has substance too, but what has made some people pay almost twice as much for a Mac machine as a Linux or Windows one is that it looks cool and it feels good to use. Commented Jun 6, 2013 at 14:20