Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 4
    I had to think hard at the "maximum possible sectors per cluster is 64", until I got it: 64 is indeed the largest power-of-2 you can represent in a signed byte: 128 isn't possible as the maximum positive signed byte value is 127. Commented May 1, 2018 at 10:28
  • 3
    @RalfKleberhoff That does naturally lead to a followup question, though: if you're storing a power of two, why store the number itself rather than the exponent on the two? Commented May 1, 2018 at 12:27
  • @DanielWagner I absolutely agree. Especially as back then when FAT16 was created, shifting was definitely a cheaper operation than multiplying. But probably they were just happy to get it running, and not software-engineering it for decades into the future... Commented May 1, 2018 at 13:04