Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Of course, that is Russian side that already has 4 ports available for docking. Nakua will replace an existing, and the UM will only offer one docking port (need to be moved to side port to free it up once docked). I was thinking Russian side had plenty of space, but US side seems a bit sparse, considering all the traffic due. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ And actually, since the UM is docked to the nadir end of Nakua, it means no additional 'docking' ports, only additional connection ports. Which matters. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ As I looked at info on the Lyappa arm on Mir, for shuffling modules about in the question: space.stackexchange.com/questions/2266/… I wonder if the UM will have 'dockable' side ports for Soyuz/Progress/ATV or only the nadir node? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 3, 2013 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ There was a report in 2010. At least one of them is said to be hybrid. That means it is possible to change probe to drouge inflight. And it is said there will be the re-docking manipulator. interfax.ru/world/169881 $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2014 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ See here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… for the description of the hybrid. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 26, 2014 at 15:51