Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Upper stages need to be smaller than the lower stages. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 5, 2019 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ Also the shape of the nozzles and the expansion of the fuel account for a lot of the efficiency design. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19, 2019 at 22:26
  • $\begingroup$ @MagicOctopusUrn: I was more thinking of exchanging lower stages for lower stages and upper stages for upper stages, not lower for upper or upper for lower; alternatively, rockets with different lower stages sharing a common upper stage, or rockets with the same lower stage using different upper stages. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 19, 2019 at 22:29
  • $\begingroup$ Regarding footnote 5, didn’t those potential Shuttle-Centaur payloads end up on Centaur anyway, meaning that they aren’t an addition to those already counted in footnote 4? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 31, 2019 at 23:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, duh, I knew that. Thanks. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 1, 2019 at 2:19