Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ safety, and ease $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2020 at 3:48
  • $\begingroup$ Related (but not duplicate): space.stackexchange.com/q/18332/18085 $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2020 at 13:19
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ There are many problems. First is vertical integration, then it's vertical integration with fuel. Are you sure you want to be the person who mounts the payload to a rocket full of fuel and with a nontrivial possibility to implode? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 6, 2020 at 1:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user3528438: What would be the difficulty of constructing the tank with an exoskeleton which could be largely detached from the craft once it was pressurized for the last time? The launch tower could be designed to support much of the weight of upper stages prior to lift-off, to allow for the possibility of a last-minute scrub and depressurization. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 12, 2023 at 17:11