Timeline for How can I remove a specific item from an array in JavaScript?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2024 at 7:23 | comment | added | Adam Gawne-Cain | This way (for-in loop) will perform well with sparse arrays, and it only iterates the array once. So it is performance safe if you want to decrement higher indices and you are not sure if your array is sparse or not. | |
| Sep 9, 2024 at 19:26 | history | edited | rozsazoltan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved code formatting
|
| S Feb 2, 2021 at 23:45 | history | suggested | Masoud Aghaei | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
put your code in code snippet so other users could see the result
|
| Feb 2, 2021 at 20:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 2, 2021 at 23:45 | |||||
| Sep 24, 2020 at 14:36 | history | edited | Lioness100 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
| Aug 21, 2016 at 23:20 | comment | added | Beejor |
I should also reiterate yckart's comment that for( i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) would be a better approach since it preserves the exact indices versus whatever order the browser decides to store the items (with for in). Doing so also lets you get the array index of a value if you need it.
|
|
| Dec 30, 2014 at 16:13 | comment | added | yckart |
@RolandIllig Except the use of a for in-loop and the fact that the script could stopped earlier, by returning the result from the loop directly. The upvotes are reasonable ;)
|
|
| May 24, 2014 at 7:02 | history | edited | user456814 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed grammar, improved code formatting.
|
| May 24, 2014 at 5:24 | history | edited | Ekramul Hoque | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Apr 2, 2013 at 10:56 | history | answered | Ekramul Hoque | CC BY-SA 3.0 |