Timeline for Check if pair is empty or uninitialized
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:45 | comment | added | CinCout | The OP might have dumbed it down. One can only guess! | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:42 | comment | added | Stack Danny |
@CinCout I wonder, in order for this not to be an XY Problem the mvce should be about a general pair<T, U> instead of the specific pair<int, int>, right?
|
|
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:17 | answer | added | Vlad from Moscow | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:16 | comment | added | n. m. could be an AI | You look at your program. Is there initialisation somewhere? Then it is initialised. No initialisation? Not initialised. In your case, there is initialisation in the std::pair constructor. Since there is no such thing as empty pair, the check here is trivial. | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:13 | history | edited | Always_Beginner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 202 characters in body
|
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:12 | answer | added | lubgr | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:11 | comment | added | CinCout | Looks like a XY problem | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:10 | answer | added | Yksisarvinen | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:10 | answer | added | songyuanyao | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 19, 2019 at 9:06 | history | asked | Always_Beginner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |