Timeline for answer to Table api by dirkgently
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2009 at 9:49 | comment | added | Iraimbilanja | Btw, maybe my intention would've been clearer with "table.row(i).cell(0)" to emphasize that the cell is indeed part of the row and not directly of the table (contrary to NP). | |
| Mar 3, 2009 at 9:47 | history | edited | Iraimbilanja | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2009 at 9:35 | comment | added | Iraimbilanja | I like to view it as distinct from Named Parameter because unlike NP, it actually reflects my object model ;) i.e. just because I'm chaining calls doesn't mean I'm doing it as a crude workaround for C++'s ugliness. I'm mostly interested in the apparent conflict between a nice api and a correct api. | |
| Mar 3, 2009 at 9:31 | history | edited | dirkgently | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2009 at 9:26 | history | answered | dirkgently | CC BY-SA 2.5 |