Timeline for answer to What are the implications of R + W > N for Cassandra clusters? by Theodore Hong
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2020 at 6:32 | comment | added | ideoutrea | good answer . if R+W=2N, It's the same as one single node, doesn't add any fault tolerance. | |
| Oct 21, 2017 at 16:33 | comment | added | Oresztesz |
@DNA just note that read repair is not done in all cases. It's controlled by read_repair_chance which is set to 0.1 by default. So you have 10% chance, that the next read will be up-to-date.
|
|
| Nov 11, 2011 at 4:56 | vote | accept | Leftium | ||
| Oct 23, 2011 at 14:04 | comment | added | DNA | Good explanation - just wanted to add that that Read Repair can update the nodes, in the background, so that the next read will be up-to-date. | |
| Oct 19, 2011 at 14:49 | history | answered | Theodore Hong | CC BY-SA 3.0 |