Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • @PeterPointer this should not have been published from the Staging Ground while it was still tagged as needing Major Changes...is there a reason why you ignored that and still published it? The code provided isn't runnable (missing code, and no sample data), the description of the output they're seeing was unspecific/incorrect, and it was becoming clear that it was basically a duplicate question. All this was documented in the Staging Ground comments. Now the OP got downvotes - that could have been avoided. Commented Mar 26 at 10:56
  • The underlying issue was clear. They were misunderstanding that they overwrite the cellMatch variable, independent of any other "problem" with the question. They got downvotes because people here are annoyed with beginners and gatekeep until the perfect question is made for some reason. There is a clear bug in the source code posted, that's what they wanted to know. Maybe staging ground should be a 3/3 vote then like when closing questions. Commented Mar 26 at 14:17