Timeline for Why is foldl defined in a strange way in Racket?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
Post Revisions
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 at 2:21 | comment | added | erjiang |
FWIW, Chez Scheme's fold-left is consistent with what you're expecting: (fold-left - 0 '(1 2 3 4)) is -10 and (fold-left cons '() '(1 2 3 4)) is ((((() . 1) . 2) . 3) . 4).
|
|
| Jan 9, 2012 at 3:38 | answer | added | newacct | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 8, 2012 at 20:14 | answer | added | Eli Barzilay | timeline score: 69 | |
| Jan 8, 2012 at 18:08 | answer | added | Ryan Culpepper | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 8, 2012 at 16:20 | history | edited | Óscar López |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 8, 2012 at 16:18 | answer | added | Óscar López | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 8, 2012 at 14:58 | history | edited | sth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 44 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2012 at 14:54 | history | asked | Racket Noob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |