Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 3
    I understand and I see the advantages. However, to be true, I learned about the double stroke option in some Latex forum many years ago and it seemed nice. Indeed I have many macros but in a sense they are all the same: hit a key twice, as on old typewriters when you wanted to have a pseudo bold. There is a logic. It is true that I get conflicts to solve, and that if I need to make a change I have to go through a bunch of corrections. I think that the source is more readable with my system, though. Maybe I'll change, I don't know. Anyway thanks for the great support by you guys. Commented 23 hours ago
  • I just add that ChatGPT couldn't find a solution even after a very long dialogue I had with it. At the end it told me that "it is impossibile" (to redefine \gg in unicode-math). I was surprised because on this topic I assumed ChatGPT to be very strong. Not so. Here I found the solution in minutes. Commented 23 hours ago
  • @mvs - You're welcome. FWIW, I'm not at all surprised to read that ChatGPT wasn't able to generate a workable solution to your LaTeX programming problem. Commented 18 hours ago