Timeline for answer to Redefine \gg in ‘unicode-math’ by Mico
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 hours ago | comment | added | Mico | @mvs - You're welcome. FWIW, I'm not at all surprised to read that ChatGPT wasn't able to generate a workable solution to your LaTeX programming problem. | |
| 22 hours ago | comment | added | mvs | I just add that ChatGPT couldn't find a solution even after a very long dialogue I had with it. At the end it told me that "it is impossibile" (to redefine \gg in unicode-math). I was surprised because on this topic I assumed ChatGPT to be very strong. Not so. Here I found the solution in minutes. | |
| 22 hours ago | comment | added | mvs | I understand and I see the advantages. However, to be true, I learned about the double stroke option in some Latex forum many years ago and it seemed nice. Indeed I have many macros but in a sense they are all the same: hit a key twice, as on old typewriters when you wanted to have a pseudo bold. There is a logic. It is true that I get conflicts to solve, and that if I need to make a change I have to go through a bunch of corrections. I think that the source is more readable with my system, though. Maybe I'll change, I don't know. Anyway thanks for the great support by you guys. | |
| yesterday | history | answered | Mico | CC BY-SA 4.0 |