TNS
VOXPOP
As a JavaScript developer, what non-React tools do you use most often?
Angular
0%
Astro
0%
Svelte
0%
Vue.js
0%
Other
0%
I only use React
0%
I don't use JavaScript
0%
Cloud Services / Operations

VMware Alternatives: A Strategic Guide to Modern Virtualization

The key challenge is finding an alternative that meets expectations for performance, cost-efficiency, workload compatibility and operational resilience.
Apr 4th, 2025 8:00am by
Featued image for: VMware Alternatives: A Strategic Guide to Modern Virtualization
Image from TippaPatt on Shutterstock.

Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware has triggered a seismic shift in the enterprise virtualization landscape. Many organizations that have long relied on VMware’s solutions are reevaluating their reliance on VMware and considering switching to more cost-effective, scalable alternatives.

However, there is no direct one-to-one replacement for VMware. Virtualization technologies continue to evolve, making it imperative for organizations to think beyond a hypervisor swap and instead focus on strategic modernization. The key challenge is identifying an alternative that meets expectations for performance, cost-efficiency, workload compatibility and operational resilience.

Let’s look at the options enterprises have as they navigate this disruption.

Assessing VMware Alternatives

At a high level, there are four options available to enterprises:

1. Retaining VMware While Optimizing Costs

For enterprises not yet able to migrate, optimizing existing VMware investments is a viable approach. Cost-control strategies include:

  • Re-evaluating VMware licensing structures to eliminate unnecessary expenses and optimize license utilization, ensuring only essential workloads remain on VMware.
  • Incorporating third-party storage solutions to minimize reliance on costly vSAN expansions while improving data protection, scalability and performance.
  • Reconfiguring host architectures to avoid excess core-based licensing fees, which can significantly affect operational budgets.

By implementing these strategies, enterprises can mitigate the VMware license cost increases, but they will still face higher costs. However, this approach only delays the inevitable and does not resolve concerns around vendor lock-in, rising costs and the future viability of VMware.

2. Transitioning to Alternative On-Premises Hypervisors

Organizations looking to move away from VMware without a full cloud migration have several viable hypervisor alternatives:

  • Nutanix AHV A leading hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) platform integrating compute, networking and storage, reducing reliance on separate infrastructure components and enhancing operational efficiency.
  • Microsoft Hyper-V A cost-effective solution embedded within Windows Server, making it an attractive alternative for Microsoft-centric environments, but it requires additional tools for advanced virtualization management.
  • OpenStack KVM A flexible open source hypervisor offering complete control over virtualization environments, but it demands strong in-house expertise and custom integrations to achieve enterprise-grade functionality.

While these alternatives preserve the traditional virtualization model, they demand significant migration efforts and staff retraining. A successful transition requires comprehensive planning, workload evaluation and automation investments to streamline migration.

3. Adopting Cloud-Based Virtualization

Public cloud solutions provide scalability, flexibility and operational agility. Notable options include:

  • VMware Cloud on AWS, Azure VMware Solution and Google Cloud VMware Engine, offering lift-and-shift capabilities for existing VMware workloads while reducing on-premises infrastructure maintenance.
  • Native public cloud compute services (AWS EC2, Azure VMs, Google Compute Engine) for enterprises prepared to rearchitect applications and leverage cloud native advantages, including automation and cost-efficiency.
  • Cloud-based virtualization enables greater elasticity, allowing enterprises to scale workloads on demand. However, concerns over long-term costs, performance variability and vendor lock-in must be carefully managed through hybrid or multicloud strategies.

4. Embracing Kubernetes-Based Virtualization

Kubernetes-based virtualization introduces a transformative shift in IT operations, requiring proficiency in container orchestration and VM administration, but it ultimately provides higher resilience, efficiency and long-term viability. By using Kubernetes native tools, enterprises can automate infrastructure management at scale, enabling self-healing, policy-driven provisioning and simplified multicloud deployment. This shift positions IT teams to drive innovation, enhance agility and support emerging use cases such as AI/ML workloads, edge computing and hybrid cloud environments.

The open source project KubeVirt and its commercially supported versions such as OpenShift Virtualization (OSV), Specto Cloud and SUSE Harvester provide enterprises with the ability to run VM workloads in containers without the need to refactor or rewrite them. This approach reduces risk and allows enterprises to modernize at their own pace, while benefiting from a common platform to manage VMs and container workloads.

Selecting the Right Modernization Path

A well-informed decision requires organizations to weigh technical, operational and financial considerations. A thorough analysis ensures that the chosen path aligns with business objectives while mitigating risks and optimizing performance in both the short and long term.

Migration Complexity and Potential Business Disruptions

A primary concern when transitioning from VMware is the complexity of migrating workloads. Enterprises must assess multiple factors to ensure a smooth transition with minimal disruptions:

  • Workload portability between hypervisors and cloud environments, ensuring seamless transitions without compromising performance, compliance or availability. Organizations should conduct detailed compatibility testing before migration to avoid unforeseen application failures.
  • Effort required to reconfigure networking, security policies and automation frameworks, as traditional VMware environments rely on proprietary tools that may not be directly transferrable. This process requires robust planning, including evaluating third-party tools to bridge compatibility gaps.
  • Potential downtime and risk mitigation strategies, using staged migrations, backup systems, high-availability configurations and rollback plans to reduce business impact. Enterprises should incorporate robust failover solutions and test recovery procedures to ensure seamless continuity.

Enterprises with deep VMware dependencies must plan for operational adjustments, including refining IT workflows, retraining staff and updating monitoring tools. Kubernetes-based virtualization offers a future-proof modernization strategy by simplifying infrastructure complexity and aligning with cloud native best practices. Additionally, Kubernetes enhances automation capabilities, reducing manual intervention and increasing overall IT agility.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Licensing Considerations

Cost increases are by far the most significant factor for organizations moving away from VMware. A thorough TCO analysis should include both direct and indirect financial impacts to ensure long-term cost efficiency.

Additionally, enterprises should account for hidden costs such as workforce retraining, integration complexities, application refactoring and service disruptions that may arise during the transition process. Accurate TCO forecasting will enable organizations to justify investment decisions and avoid unforeseen budget overruns.

Automation, Scalability and Long-Term Operational Efficiency

Different virtualization platforms offer varying degrees of automation and scalability. Organizations should assess the following factors to maximize efficiency and support long-term growth:

  • Ease of management interfaces and administrative workflows, ensuring that IT teams can operate efficiently without excessive complexity. A well-designed UI and automation-friendly architecture can significantly reduce time spent on routine tasks and troubleshooting.
  • Compatibility with automation tools and orchestration frameworks, allowing for streamlined deployment, monitoring and scaling of workloads. Integration with Terraform, Ansible, Kubernetes Operators and CI/CD pipelines should be evaluated for automation effectiveness.
  • Readiness of IT teams to transition to new operational models, requiring investment in training and knowledge transfer to maximize the benefits of alternative platforms. Hands-on training, certifications and vendor partnerships can help accelerate skill development and reduce the learning curve.

Conclusion

The enterprise virtualization landscape is shifting rapidly due to vendor changes and technological advancements. Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware and its licensing changes have driven organizations to reassess their virtualization strategies, creating an opportunity for more flexible and cost-effective infrastructure.

Each alternative to VMware has its benefits and trade-offs, requiring evaluation based on organizational needs. Microsoft Hyper-V offers cost advantages for Windows-centric environments, while OpenStack provides flexibility with added complexity. Cloud-managed virtualization enables modernization without major application changes, easing cloud adoption.

KubeVirt bridges traditional virtualization and containerization, offering a unified platform for diverse workloads. This is ideal for organizations invested in Kubernetes that want to extend support to virtual machines. Commercially supported solutions like Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization, Spectro Cloud and SUSE Harvester enable gradual modernization without disruption.

Each organization’s path will depend on workload needs, skills, existing investments and strategic goals. A phased, thoughtful approach can lead to a more flexible, cost-effective and future-proof infrastructure. While challenging, this transition presents an opportunity to reset virtualization strategies for long-term success.

For enterprises exploring KubeVirt-based solutions such as OpenShift Virtualization, Spectro Cloud, SUSE Harvester and others, Portworx by Pure Storage provides storage automation, backup, application migration and disaster recovery across traditional and containerized workloads, helping to maintain operational stability and data protection.

For more information, please download our “Buyer’s Guide to Modern Virtualization.” Join our upcoming webinar on modern virtualization here. Want to see Portworx in action? Join us for an upcoming Hands-on Lab.

Created with Sketch.
TNS DAILY NEWSLETTER Receive a free roundup of the most recent TNS articles in your inbox each day.