
If Sam Bayer is nervous this morning by the deafening and divisive online opinions surrounding New Line's latest trailer for
A Nightmare on Elm Street, a reboot of the Freddy Krueger franchise, he's not showing it. In fact, he's pretty mellow with a pack of Marlboros in hand ready to sit down with Shock Till You Drop at L'Ermitage's writer's lounge (where scripts for
Jaws and
The Godfather hang on the walls across from the bar) in Beverly Hills, pound some coffee and talk about his controversial feature debut.
Bayer has made his career in the music video world having directed "Smells Like Teen Spirit" for Nirvana, Garbage's "Only Happy When It Rains" and David Bowie's "The Heart's Filthy Lesson" to name a few.
A Nightmare on Elm Street, opening on April 30, marks the end of a long flirtation between Bayer and Platinum Dunes' producers Michael Bay, Brad Fuller and Andrew Form. As you'll read below, Bayer was involved in a number of their projects until he finally accepted to dance with Freddy Krueger and bring this maniac back to the screen.
Ryan Rotten: You've had a relationship with the Platinum Dunes fellas for a while, right? You almost directed a few of their projects.
Samuel Bayer: Yeah, we go all the way back to
Texas Chainsaw Massacre. For whatever reason, I just said no. I said no to that and no to
Amityville Horror. I always liked the guys a lot and as I saw the success of different movies and what they were doing with titles, I think we developed a relationship. We had another title, a remake of
Near Dark. I think when
Twilight was coming out, that was the competing vampire movie. It was very hard to compete against that.
Rotten: Sure, but those two films are different beasts.
Bayer: Oh, I would have loved to have done that. I'm a big fan of Bigelow and
The Hurt Locker.
Near Dark is a very underrated cult movie. The first 45 minutes is insane. But, that fell apart. I was going to do another film with them called
Fiasco Heights which is like a
Sin City-type film. For whatever reason, that didn't happen. Then
Nightmare came about. Initially, I said no.
Rotten: Right, you passed on it twice and then Michael Bay approached you. What happened during that conversation?
Bayer: Michael sent me an e-mail and made a lot of sense. Just talking about the business and why this was a good movie to make. There was a lot of opportunities in doing this that might not have happened with another film. I think what he said made a lot of sense and I think it's hard to argue with the richest guy in Hollywood.
Rotten: Had you ever been so vigorously pursued by another producer like that?
Bayer: Probably not, no.
Rotten: Why now break into features?
Bayer: I've been wanting to make a movie for a while and besides
The Boys there's other stuff I've had in production. I was going to make a movie with Benicio Del Toro at one time. I was attached to
Monsters Ball ten years ago. Various projects came and went, years passed. Now I think what happened was was I thought whatever that first film was going to be, it better be the right one. Michael said I could wait forever and it might not ever happen. He definitely got my appetite whet and the more I thought about what could be done with this franchise, the more excited I got.
Rotten: How close was Near Dark to becoming a reality?
Bayer: We had various drafts. We certainly were not at the casting stage, nor did we have a finished script. Michael was looking at pages. It was an updated version of the original. In retrospect, that's a tough one. Lance Henriksen did such an amazing job as the lead. Bill Paxton� Everything Bigelow did with the movie, I'm glad it didn't happen. It was done pretty damn well the first time, you know?
Rotten: I agree. I never want to see a remake.
Bayer: The only thing I'll say about
Near Dark, it seemed liked if there was one thing we could have worked on is it feels like they rushed the third act of the movie. But the rest of it was amazing. Looking back, I'm glad it didn't happen.
Rotten: When Nightmare came along, was it solely the Wesley Strick draft?
Bayer: I think it was a combination of Wesley's draft and Eric's draft.
Rotten: And was there stuff on the page that immediately made you satisfied with the decision you made to commit to the project? Or was there still plenty of tinkering, in your mind, that needed to be done?
Bayer: I think there was definitely stuff that needed to be tinkered with, but you can see the bones and the frame of it on the page. People are going to talk about the movie. We've gone in a slightly different direction with our take on Freddy and I like that. We delve a little deeper into him as a person. How he became the thing he was. That's certainly attracted me to this character. He's not a mindless guy with an axe. He's a thinking, talking, psychologically disturbed character.
Rotten: Do you find any merits in the sequels or do you strictly dig the first film?
Bayer: I think the first one is really the one I look to as my inspiration. Freddy wasn't a jokester, and if he did tell jokes, they were sick and dark. He scared people. That's what I'm attracted to. That's what Wes Craven created that we pay homage to. Hopefully, the fans will get that. I love what Robert Englund did with it and people remember different pieces of the franchise, but it really is the original that has the DNA of what the character is supposed to be which is really scary.
Rotten: Being a highly visual guy, was there anything attractive about the aesthetic of Craven's original that you liked, too?
Bayer: Just the fact that he came up with the genius of that sweater and claw. The Fedora, burnt skin. I look at it like, there are overtones of
Blue Velvet and David Lynch movies in there. There's a strange quality to the original movie.
Rotten: The small town portrayal?
Bayer: Exactly. You can't describe it as camp. There's a deliberate sensibility and that's what we tried to do with this one. It takes place in Springwood, Ohio, this fictitious universe that's a microcosm of the American experience. Craven is a smart guy and there's a deeper meaning in his movies. It's definitely not a standard slasher film. This is a movie that you can mention to people and their jaws drop. And not because I'm redoing it, but because of that franchise, that character, had a profound effect on their childhood. And not just for horror fans. I hear things like, "Freddy scared the hell out of me." I think what I want to do and what everyone involved wants to do is re-invent the character for a new generation, I think I'd be happy if people welcome this and at the same time see we're going off on a slightly different path, but if you follow the DNA of it, it goes all the way back to the first movie.
Rotten: I'm surprised to see so many of the iconic moments from the original resurface, like the glove in the bathtub�
Bayer: We had a screening where I heard people clapping when she gets in the bathtub. I heard people clapping when Kris floats up in the air. We did it for the fans, ultimately. You might not remember these scenes, but my God, if you do, we tried to honor them. I really hope the kids who are fans of this franchise get it, we did it for them.
Rotten: What have you, personally, brought to the table?
Bayer: I certainly think there's a deliberate looking and feeling to this. I'm proud of the performances we've gotten. I think we made an intelligent horror movie. I said to a friend during a discussion, you can either pretend and try and put style into something, or your style speaks for itself and you're not pretending. That's where I am. If anyone does know me or my music videos, you'll see this movie is connected to that style. The way I see the world is part of this movie.
Rotten: You're fresh off a second test screening. Do you like that part of the process?
Bayer: All I can say is I find that process to be like going to the proctologist and you hope he doesn't find anything. But if he does find something, because they found it soon enough, they can cure you. The last test went well. It's an interesting process because what you think works in a dark room at 3am may not necessarily work with 300 people in a dark room two weeks later. After going through this, I definitely believe in the process. Doesn't mean that it's pleasant or fun. Doesn't mean listening to a focus group of wannabe filmmakers dissect your work is fun, but sometimes they're right.
Rotten: Was Jackie Earle Haley's involvement already being mulled over when you were brought in?
Bayer: It was definitely not a decision made before I came on board, but he was the first name that Andrew, Brad and myself got excited about. We got our hands on a screen test for Rorschach that he gave to Zack Snyder that was unbelievable. It blew my mind. He's the real deal. He becomes that character. I appreciate his craft and how much he cares about what he does. You have got to convince someone that you're a psychopathic character with a burned face and a claw. I don't know how much research you can do for that, but you've got an Academy Award-nominated actor that has to go deep to find that and not do it in a silly way. I hope people see and respect what he did with the movie because he worked hard. The glove he wears is a really heavy, nasty object. There's something empowering about it when you put it on. We did a couple of scenes with him and Nancy where he's threatening her with it and it's just creepy.
Rotten: Any close calls with the glove?
Bayer: Thankfully, no. Luckily nobody got hurt.
Rotten: The recent test screening was with the footage you shot in December?
Bayer: We re-shot a couple of scenes over the holiday, I think it helped the movie. There are good scares.
Rotten: You told me that the scene we saw on the day we visited the set has been cut out of the movie. Take me into the editing room, between a couple of deleted scenes I'm hearing about and the reshoots, what balance were you trying to find?
Bayer: I think we found that some stuff that we thought worked really well, didn't work as well as it did. We were in a really lucky position to re-think some stuff. I think some of it has to do with scares, some of it has to do with how much you saw Freddy. Some character stuff. It's all tiny pieces of a puzzle, like the scene you mentioned and saw. It's not that it didn't work great, it just means it's a better movie without the scenes we cut. You can't be precious about stuff.
Rotten: Being new to the feature film game what horror film inspired you?
Bayer: I think the success of
Paranormal Activity certainly influenced me. I looked back - and I've said this in other interviews, but I think it comes out wrong - I appreciate what's out there. I don't personally like torture porn, but real horror comes out of believing in your characters. I think a movie like
The Strangers works. It's what you don't see that makes you scared. If I'm influenced by something, it's trying to create real flesh and blood characters that you're invested in emotionally. What I've learned, especially with Andrew and Brad, some of it is just timing issues. Cutting something a certain way to make it scarier.
Rotten: Your dynamic with those two was good?
Bayer: I think we've had a good relationship.
Rotten: I'm just curious because they've been courting you for so long.
Bayer: It's like any relationship. I think there were times they threw the engagement ring back at me and said they never wanted to see me again. There are other times we were madly in love with each other.
Rotten: One of the things hinted at during our set visit was something called the "Nightmare Map," can you explain what that is in the film?
Bayer: We had something, at one time, one of the characters - every time he went into a dream - he'd come back out and write down where he had been and that would be a clue for the other characters. It's just something that didn't translate. It's this wonderful idea that meant more on paper than it did on the screen. But I'll be selling my Nightmare Maps on Sunset Blvd. for a dollar a piece. [laughs]
Rotten: Now, after this you're off to work on the score. Who's doing it?
Bayer: Steve Jablonsky. We're still in the midst of post-production.
Rotten: Is Jablonsky working in the Nightmare themes?
Bayer: I think it's pretty cool what he did. I don't want to give anything away, but you'll hear. You'll see. I think he did a great job and is very talented.
Rotten: We're talking on the day the full trailer is released. Are you reading what people say online?
Bayer: I do read what they say. I think everybody has to realize this is a movie made by fans of the genre. Platinum Dunes respects the genre. People should understand this was made for the fans and not to disrespect the series. I read stuff and there's a lot of venom. Some people can't wait to see it and others�they want Platinum Dunes to burn in hell.
Rotten: Or get cancer. That's the worst one�
Bayer: Or, why don't they get a real director to do this? Listen, for every one of those, there's something really clue. I read a lot of great responses to the new trailer. I don't think people get it's a big movie. Sometimes horror movies feel like they weren't made on big budgets, we tried to make a movie that looks and feels really big.
Rotten: Doing this, obviously you have no qualms against the idea of Hollywood doing remakes�
Bayer: People think Hollywood does remakes because we're out of ideas. I think it's less we're out of ideas, it's more: If something's done cool one way, maybe there's another way to do it really cool. I get criticized for this, I'm not Chris Nolan, but I like what he did with Batman. That's not to knock the TV show, Burton's vision or the Val Kilmer version, but there are ways to reinvent stuff. I don't think everything needs to be remade.
The Exorcist,
Citizen Kane, I don't think they all need to be redone.
Rotten: To me, it seems like some characters or properties refuse to die but their franchises hit a creative wall and there's nothing left to do but hit the restart button.
Bayer: I love that. You almost have to wipe the slate clean.
Rotten: Spider-Man is the most recent, but I think they could have gotten away with a fourth film if they played it right.
Bayer: Or
The Hulk, there should be a proper time period.
Rotten: Are you lining up projects now that you're in the home stretch with Nightmare?
Bayer: Yeah, I'm catching my breath but I've been offered some stuff. There's one comic book I really dig that I want to go after that's bad-ass. I'd like to get it, it's called
The Boys. It's about a group of mercenaries and they're job is to kick the shit out of superheroes who get out of line. It doesn't get any better than that. In the world of
The Boys, superheroes are scumbags. My youngest brother is a comic book historian and he introduced me to a lot of graphic novels like "The Dark Knight." There are some great books I don't think people have tapped into yet.
Rotten: Do you think you have a future with Krueger?
Bayer: I think we've had our run. It doesn't mean we don't love each other.
For more coverage:
Set Report |
Jackie Earle Haley Interview |
Trailers & Photo Gallery
Comments
Posted by: jasonvoorhees25 on March 2, 2010 at 19:57:47
I can't wait it's look so awesom! add me on myspace if you like Horror Movies http://www.myspace.com/jasonvoorhees25
Posted by: Fridge on March 2, 2010 at 20:21:47
Really? Couldn't ask him what the movie's rating would be? That's one of the biggest mysteries at this point: whether or not they pussied out.
Posted by: Sweateriswrongdipshts on March 2, 2010 at 20:25:02
"Just the fact that he came up with the genius of that sweater and claw" "I think the first one is really the one I look to as my inspiration."
Why the **** did you put Krueger in the wrong sweater?
Posted by: Ryan Rotten, Managing Editor on March 2, 2010 at 20:29:08
Fridge: Rated R, man. Not going to waste a question on that.
Posted by: ano nymous on March 2, 2010 at 20:48:47
hearts filthy lesson is an all time fav piece.
i was really excited to hear bayer was gonna be making nightmares.
hope he rocked it.
Posted by: chris on March 2, 2010 at 22:27:00
He has made some amazing videos.His first feature is a long time coming.I cant wait till this comes out!
Posted by: Klynsy on March 2, 2010 at 23:12:22
I still don't see how it's the wrong sweater. The sweater changed so many times. Hey...it's closer to the original look than New Nightmare was. No one had a problem with that! Or did they...? Ah, people are just too critical these days.
Posted by: z3ro on March 2, 2010 at 23:38:13
lol@ "its the wrong sweater" you idiots just love to b*tch about anything huh? whats next? he didnt shave right? his sox are the wrong size? wait his underwear too! his skin is too light! not enough lip stick!
Posted by: Aaron on March 3, 2010 at 02:05:58
I personally feel like it is a complete waste of time to judge something in regards to other renditions of it. Whether that be horror flicks, superhero movies, etc. Why does it have to conform to original movies to be good? I think we should look at each movie in its own context, and decide from what we are given whether it is good or not. If the sweater looking a certain way for the movie means THAT MUCH to you, then you are missing the point of movies entirely. It's not about whether they keep to standards/tradition, but instead what they make of what they have and/or given.
Posted by: Fridge on March 3, 2010 at 02:30:23
Ryan, I'll have to take you're word on that. All I've been hearing from early screenings is that there's barely any blood/gore, no nudity, and "****" is used once. Sounds like weak, PG-13 horror to me.
Posted by: good God, ya'll on March 3, 2010 at 10:05:07
wrong sweater? its red and green, striped. what else do you want? i have no idea how thats the wrong sweater other than holes in it. get over it. ***** .
im looking forwad to this. so far i havent disagreed with one thing the director has said in any interview, and i love Jackie. he's pretty good at anything he does.
Posted by: Ryan Rotten, Managing Editor on March 3, 2010 at 10:52:17
@Fridge - Far as I know, it's on track for an R.
Posted by: Bouncy X on March 3, 2010 at 12:30:39
the wrong sweater answer...y
in the first movie, his arms don't have any stripes, its just pure red. but the movie was so dark that most never notice this.
those complaining are just your stereotypical nerds who nitpick every single thing. i'm a huge Elm St. fan and i could care less about the stripes issue. he had stripes all over since Part 2, for 7 movies...so no **** they used that look.
Posted by: m34nstr34k on March 3, 2010 at 12:34:29
I like Sam Bayer's attitude and his answers to the questions. If you're a Krueger fan and like the franchise check out this blog post:
http://m34nstr34k.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/a-nightmare-on-elm-street-1984-to-the-present/
Posted by: The.Watcher on March 3, 2010 at 13:07:52
I really dig the way Bayer handled himself, purely cos of his attitude - I'm gonna see Nightmare on opening day.
This is practically the only horror franchise that I like. Friday was always MEH, Leprechaun sucks, Halloween I never got into and I really hate torture porn.
A good horror is a smart horror- like Nightmare, New Nightmare, The Thing etc...
But man oh man, did Freddy scare the piss out of me.
Posted by: Calum on March 3, 2010 at 13:23:12
How the hell is this movie controversial? If this is controversial, you people need to watch the bloody news for some real world problems instead of causing controversy over a remake. You know, more important things and all that. Don't bother having priorities at all.
I'll go see this, I like Jackie Earle Haley, Thomas Dekker and Kyle Gallner and am eager to see how Rooney Mara works out as Nancy...
Posted by: Ryan Rotten, Managing Editor on March 3, 2010 at 13:54:52
I think it goes without saying that anything written about films has no gravity against REAL WORLD issues. Right? I mean, this is an entertainment site, after all. But in terms of the genre and Nightmare fans, yes, this reboot is controversial.
Posted by: RED X on March 3, 2010 at 16:05:10
This look cool I really want to see some ****ing blood on the film and I really hate the idea of Jackie has Freddy. But even so I will see the film and hopefully Jackie proof me wrong.
by the way I want a Freddy vs. Jason movie.
and Ryan good interview.
Posted by: E on March 3, 2010 at 18:19:32
should be fun.
Posted by: Larry on March 3, 2010 at 20:13:26
This remake will be very scary.
Just a heads up to all those who arent
100 percent sure they want to see this..
Dont say you werent warned.
To those who say it will suck...I doubt that
very seriously. Just because it isnt Robert
Englund as Freddy doesnt mean it will suck.
After the film comes out I think most will
say the film was great. A REAL SCARE.
This film will make people AFRAID of
FREDDY again. In theaters people will
jump with fear, they will scream with fear,
some will pee their pants in fear.
This NIGHTMARE wont be soon forgotten...
April 30th..WILL U BE READY FOR FREDDY.??
Posted by: RED X on March 3, 2010 at 21:04:19
Larry your are ****ing funny.
Posted by: grimknightx on March 4, 2010 at 01:26:12
haheh can't wait to watch it FOR FREE when someone sneaks in and put it online, What a waste of a movie this is!
Posted by: some guy on March 4, 2010 at 04:36:31
Wow, recently I was looking forward to this just becasue of Haley (for I have grown to respect his talent). Now I have a large respect for Sam Bayer. He was professional, and respectful throughout that whole interview. The fact that he talked about what he read from the fans means, to me, that what we are asking for is what we are getting. I'll be there opening night. It is going to be cool, and scary as hell.
Posted by: anikenvader on March 4, 2010 at 08:19:48
well i have to say there quite more positive comments on more recent things then there were when WE HAD ONLY A POSTER OF THE TITLE, PART OF HIS FACE ONA POSTER AND 2 AND HALF MUINUTES OF FILM THAT WE COULD BARELY TELL WHAT WAS GOING ON! gah, im glad peopel are finally seeign the light that this movie is going to be really good. and about the less gore and not a lot of blood, thats what they said with the new halloween movies and they were blood baths! im not so much worried about that but it means that there pertaining to story and putting some bloody secuences in there! its gonn rule! i repect the people who will nto see this and leave it at that but people who rubi t in peopels face that its goignto be bad, jsut get off the site. if u dont like it, dont comment. were tired of hearing about it. i think this interview was very enlightenign and kind of pumped me up more! and goign to see thsi mvoie, midnight showing and liek i said, i doubt theres not going to be much blood and gore.
Posted by: Jonesy on March 4, 2010 at 18:58:28
The wrong sweater?? WTF? It's red and green one then the other. You really can't get it very wrong unless you make it brighter or something like a luau shirt or some ****. Still, I say they GOT THE WRONG ****ING ACTOR. Let's not forget that. I don't care how good or bad the film is. It's still not Freddy Krueger aka Robert Englund. But go ahead, PD. Rape my childhood all you want. You don't care and sadly I'll still see your movies anyway.
Why am I thinking of Obi-Wan's quote now?:
"Who's more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him?"
1
Add a comment