Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
Access
You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen Reader
This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.Journal Article
The Misrepresentation of Anthropology and Its Consequences
Herbert S. Lewis
American Anthropologist
Vol. 100, No. 3 (Sep., 1998), pp. 716-731
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the American Anthropological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/682051
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!
Topics: Cultural anthropology, Anthropology, Political anthropology, Paleoanthropology, American literature, United States history, Cultural studies, Literary criticism, History instruction, Misrepresentation
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
- Item Type
- Article
- Thumbnails
- References
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Abstract
Critiques of anthropology from within the discipline and from without have been a major feature of our intellectual life since the late 1960s. The theoretical and empirical bases of cultural and social anthropology have been under attack since the Marxist and New Left critiques of the 1960s to those coming more recently from poststructuralism, postmodernist and literary theory, and postcolonial and cultural studies. As a result, several academic generations have been educated by reading the attacks on the field but rarely dealing with the actual theoretical works and ethnographies of earlier anthropologists. This article deals with several of the most common charges leveled at anthropology, notably that it has regularly and necessarily exoticized "Others," has been ahistorical, and has treated each culture as if it were an isolate, unconnected to any other. It demonstrates how inaccurate and easily falsifiable such claims are and recommends a critical reevaluation of these unexamined and destructive cliches.
Page Thumbnails
-
[716]
-
717
-
718
-
719
-
720
-
721
-
722
-
723
-
724
-
725
-
726
-
727
-
728
-
729
-
730
-
731
American Anthropologist © 1998 American Anthropological Association