What Factors Predict Scientists' Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?
Abstract
There is a drive for more scientists to engage with the lay public. The authors used an augmented version of the theory of planned behavior and identified three factors that predicted scientists' intentions to participate in public engagement activities, over and above their past actions: attitude (whether participation was regarded as positive), perceived behavioral control (beliefs about whether participation was under their control), and descriptive norms (whether scientists believe their colleagues participate). Factors such as career recognition and time constraints did not significantly predict intentions. These findings will contribute to the design of interventions to promote public engagement.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Ajzen, I. (1971). Attitudinal versus normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communications on behavior. Sociometry, 34, 263-280.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 107-122.
Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved from http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B.L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24, 207-224.
Bamberg, S. (2002). Implementation intention versus monetary incentive comparing the effects of interventions to promote the purchase of organically produced food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 573-587.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285-301.
Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1-62.
Breslin, C., Li, S., Tupker, E., & Sdao-Jarvie, K. (2001). Application of the theory of planned behavior to predict research dissemination: A prospective study among addiction counselors. Science Communication, 22, 423-437.
Burak, L.J. (1994). Examination and prediction of elementary school teachers' intentions to teach HIV/AIDS education. AIDS Education and Prevention, 6, 310-321.
Burns, T.W., O'Connor, D.J., & Stocklmayer, S.M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 183-202.
Chassin, L., Presson, C.C., Sherman, S.J., Corty, E., & Olshavsky, R.W. (1984). Predicting the onset of cigarette smoking in adolescents: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 224-243.
Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., & Reno, R.R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
Clery, D. (2003). Bringing science to the cafés. Science, 300, 2026.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
Conner, M., & Armitage, C.J. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1429-1464.
Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (2005). Theory of planned behaviour and health behaviour . In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behaviour (2nd ed., pp. 170-222). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Council for Science and Technology. (2005). Universal ethical code for scientists: Consultation letter and code. Retrieved from www.cst.gov.uk/cst/business/files/ethicalcode-letter.pdf
Crawley, F.E. (1990). Intentions of science teachers to use investigative teaching methods: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 685-697.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum .
Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.
Dunning, D., Johnson, K.L., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83-87.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gagné, C., & Godin, G. (2000). The theory of planned behavior: Some measurement issues concerning belief-based variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 2173-2193.
Gascoigne, T., & Metcalfe, J. (1997). Incentives and impediments to scientists communicating through the media. Science Communication, 18, 265-282.
Gollwitzer, P.M. (1990). Action phases and mindsets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53-92). New York: Guilford.
Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-120.
Gorsuch, R.L., & Ortberg, J. (1983). Moral obligation and attitudes: Their relation to behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1025-1028.
Greenwood, M.R.C., & Riordan, D.G. (2001). Civic scientist/civic duty. Science Communication, 231, 28-40.
Grube, J.W., Morgan, M., & McGree, S.T. (1986). Attitudes and normative beliefs as predictors of smoking intentions and behaviours: A test of three models. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 81-93.
Haney, J.J., Czerniak, C.M., & Lumpe, A.T. (1996). Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 971-993.
Hardeman, W., Johnston, M., Johnston, D.W., Bonetti, D., Wareham, N., & Kinmonth, A.L. (2002). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to behaviour change interventions: A systematic review . Psychology and Health, 17, 123-158.
Hart, H.L. (1961). The concept of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational vs. volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101-120.
Hofstein, A., & Rosenfield, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87-112.
Hughes, C. (2001, February). Shackled to stereotypes. Science and Public A fairs, 21-23.
Hyman, H.H., & Singer, E. (1968). Readings in referent group theory and research . New York: Free Press.
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2004). Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers' engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Science Communication, 25, 246-259.
Kaiser, F.G., & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism . Personality and Individual Di ferences, 35, 1033-1048.
Kalichman, S.C., & Hospers, H.J. (1997). Efficacy of a behavioral skills enactment HIV risk reduction interventions in community settings. AIDS, 11, S191-S199.
Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Attitudes, intentions and behavior: A study of women's participation in collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1431-1446.
Kinket, B., Paans, L., & Verplanken, B. (1992). Patient education by general practitioners: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Gedrag and Gezondheid Tijdschrift voor Psychologie and Gezondheid, 20, 187-195.
Kurland, N.B. (1995). Ethical intentions and the theories of reasoned action and past behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 297-313.
Leshner, A.I. (2003). Public engagement with science. Science, 299, 977.
Manstead, A.S.R. (2000). The role of moral norm in the attitude-behavior relation. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context (pp. 11-30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Milne, S., Orbell, S., & Sheeran, P. (2002). Combining motivational and volitional interventions to promote exercise participation: Protection motivation theory and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 163-184.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing the invariances in personality and the role of situations . Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
Mowen, J.C., Middlemist, R.C., & Luther, D. (1981). Joint effects of assigned goal level and incentive structure on task performance: A laboratory study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 598—603.
Nucifora, J., Gallois, C., & Kashima, Y. (1993). Influences on condom use among undergraduates: Testing the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. In D. J. Terry, C. Gallois, & M. McCamish (Eds.), The theory of reasoned action: Its application to AIDS-preventive behavior (pp. 47-64). New York: Pergamon.
Office of Science and Techology and the Wellcome Trust. (2001). Science and the public: A review of science communication and public attitudes toward science in Britain. London : Author.
Ouellette, J.A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 57-74.
Paulussen, T., Kok, G., Schaalma, H., & Parcel, G.S. (1995). Diffusion of AIDS curricula among Dutch secondary school teachers. Health Education Quarterly, 22, 227-243.
Pearson, G. (2001). The participation of scientist in public understanding of science activities: The policy and practice of the UK research councils . Public Understanding of Science, 10, 121-137.
Pearson, G., Pringle, S.M., & Thomas, J.N. (1997). Scientists and the public understanding of science . Public Understanding of Science, 6, 279-289.
Poliakoff, E. (2005). Evaluation of a brain awareness week activity [Unpublished data]. The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Poliakoff, E., Baraas, R., Cotton, P., & Schiessl, I. (2004, Summer). From `boffins' to `top bananas ' in brain awareness week. British Neuroscience Association Newsletter, 48, 12-13.
Raats, M., Shepherd, R., & Sparks, P. (1995). Including moral dimensions of choice within the structure of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 484-494.
Randall, D.M., & Gibson, A.M. (1991). Ethical decision making in the medical profession: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 111-122.
Rogers, R.W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153-176). London: Guilford.
Rosenstock, I.M. (1974). Historical origins of the health belief model . Health Education Monographs, 2, 1-8.
Royal Society. (2005). Survey of factors a fecting science communication. Report on qualitative data. London: Author.
Royal Society. (2006). Survey of factors a fecting science communication by scientists and engineers. Final report. London: Author.
Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Pickles, A., & Simonoff, E. (1998). Retrospective recall recalled. In R. Cairns, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual: Essays in honor of Marian Radke. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schwarzer, R. (2001). Social-cognitive factors in changing health-related behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 47-51.
Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behavior: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2107-2142.
Smith, J.A. (1999). Towards a relational self: Social engagement during pregnancy and psychological preparation for motherhood. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 409-426.
Sparks, P. (1994). Attitudes towards food: Applying, assessing and extending the theory of planned behaviour. In D. R. Rutter & L. Quine (Eds.), The social psychology of health and safety: European perspectives (pp. 25-46). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. (1995). Assessing and structuring attitudes toward the use of gene technology in food production: The role of perceived ethical obligation . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 267-285.
Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K.A. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between subjects and within-subjects analyses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 820-828.
Warren, J. (2006). Talking takes time. Retrieved April 19, 2004, from http://www.the-ba.net/the-ba/CurrentIssues/ReportsandPublications/ScienceAndPublicAffairs/SPAMarch06/TalkingTakesTime.htm
Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2005). Integrating concepts from goal theories to understand the achievement of personal goals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 69-96.
Webb, T.L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 249-268.
Wegner, D.M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54, 480-492.
Weigold, M.F. (2001). Communicating science: A review of the literature . Science Communication, 23, 164-193.
Wellcome Trust. (2000). The role of scientists in public debate. Full report. London: Author.
White, K.M., Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. (1994). Safer sex behavior: The role of attitudes, norms, and control factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2164-2192.
Winter, E. (2004). Public communication of science and technology: German and European perspectives. Science Communication, 25, 288-293.
Wolfendale Committee. (1995). Final report. London: Office of Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.dti.gov.uk/ost/ostbusiness/puset/report.htm
Zacharakis, A.L., & Meyer, G.D. (1995). A lack of insight: Do venture capitalists really understand their own decision processes? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 57-76.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: December 2007
Issue published: December 2007
Keywords
History
Published online: December 1, 2007
Issue published: December 2007
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 1492
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Web of Science: 193 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 197
- A triangulated approach for understanding scientists’ perceptions of p...
- A method for the critical analysis of science communication texts
- How institutional factors at US land-grant universities impact scienti...
- The Sagan Effect and Scientists’ Public Outreach Participation in Chin...
- Disciplinary cultures and participation in international research netw...
- Geoscientists' views about science communication: predicting willingne...
- Academics’ Attitudes Toward Engaging in Public Discussions: Experiment...
- Researchers’ Public Engagement in the Context of Interdisciplinary Res...
- Threats, challenges and sustainable conservation strategies for freshw...
- Strategic communication as planned behavior for science and risk commu...
- Residents’ behavioral intention to participate in neighborhood micro-r...
- Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists’ attitude, nor...
- An exploratory study of Indian scientists’ perceptions of their roles ...
- Communicating research in academia and beyond: sources of self-efficac...
- Motivation to participate in secondary science communication
- Assessing motivations and barriers to science outreach within academic...
- Mapping mental models of science communication: How academics in Germa...
- Teaching scientists to communicate: developing science communication t...
- How accurate are news mentions of scholarly output? A content analysis
- Reversing the Lens on Public Engagement with Science: Positive Benefit...
- Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives undersco...
- Public Communication Practices and Beliefs Among Conservation Scientis...
- Top Indian scientists as public communicators: a survey of their perce...
- Üniversitelerin Bilim iletişimi Etkinliklerinin Kurumsallaştırılması Ü...
- Improving public science communication: a case study of scientists’ ne...
- Let’s nab fake science news: Predicting scientists’ support for interv...
- Risk Researchers’ Views About the Goal of Trying to Ensure Policymaker...
- The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative concept...
- Effect of Context on Scientists’ Normative Beliefs
- Prosociality in science
- Participatory budgeting for research funding decisions
- Opinion of television managers about their viewers and their interest ...
- Something Very Fishy: An Informal STEAM Project Making a Case for Ocea...
- Is public engagement gendered? An analytical proposal using some evide...
- Mycorrhizal science outreach: Scope of action and available resources ...
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory bo...
- How to foster scientific knowledge integration in coastal management
- How do researchers approach societal impact?
- Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic...
- Beyond the ivory tower: Measuring and explaining academic engagement w...
- Why Should Scientists be on YouTube? It’s all About Bamboo, Oil and Ic...
- From intent to implementation: Factors affecting public involvement in...
- Why scientists agree to participate in science festivals: evidence fro...
- How to get your feet wet in public engagement: Perspectives from fresh...
- Elevate your work through incorporation of public engagement
- Do scientists have a responsibility to provide climate change expertis...
- Majority of German citizens, US citizens and climate scientists suppor...
- Policy Inconsistency between Science and Technology Promotion and Grad...
- Aichi Target 18 beyond 2020: mainstreaming Traditional Biodiversity Kn...
- The Engagement Activities of ESTCube-1: How Estonia Built and Fell in ...
- Evolution of the public understanding of science based on a bibliometr...
- ‘Is climate science taking over the science?’: A corpus-based study of...
- Comunicar las ciencias desde las instituciones: dos modelos de análisi...
- The Evolving Field of Risk Communication
- Einflussfaktoren bei der Social-Media-Nutzung in der Wissenschaftskomm...
- Increasing the Impact of Public Engagement Within and Beyond the Ecolo...
- A Citizen Science State of the World’s Wetlands Survey
- Mind the gap: Can a professional development programme build a univers...
- Is online public engagement a new challenge in the university communic...
- A Scientist’s Guide for Engaging in Policy in the United States
- Animal Experimentation and Society: Scientists’ Motivations, Incentive...
- Lithuanian scientists’ behavior and views on science communication
- Does newspapers coverage influence the citations count of scientific p...
- Scientists as public communicators: individual- and institutional-leve...
- Challenges and facilitators of public engagement with water, sanitatio...
- Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore...
- Public Engagement Measurement
- What is environmental media studies?
- Incentives and barriers for participation in community-based environme...
- Patient and public involvement in biomedical research: training is not...
- Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding sci...
- Validating a scale to measure engineers’ perceived self-efficacy for e...
- Does public outreach impede research performance? Exploring the ‘resea...
- Characteristics of collaborative, interdisciplinary, and engaged resea...
- Engineering identity and communication outcomes: comparing integrated ...
- An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (A...
- Public communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why?
- Scientific societies’ support for public engagement: an interview stud...
- Mediatization of a Research Group: The Estonian Student Satellite ESTC...
- Students meet authentic science: the valence and foci of experiences r...
- Bustling public communication by astronomers around the world driven b...
- Rediscovering public engagement in higher education: A bridge between ...
- “Antarctica just has this hero factor…”: Gendered barriers to Australi...
- A comparison between scientists’ and communication scholars’ views abo...
- Partizipative Hochschulkommunikation
- Kommunikationsfunktionen im Mehrebenensystem Hochschule
- The Use of ICT in Researcher Development
- Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 t...
- Hypotheses : l’inscription d’une pratique de communication dans l’acti...
- Impacts of a comprehensive public engagement training and support prog...
- Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage
- Scientists’ views about communication objectives
- Attributes of Weathercasters Who Engage in Climate Change Education Ou...
- Outreaching, Outsourcing, and Disembedding...
- Duty now for the future: a call for public outreach by animal behaviou...
- Critical Perspectives of Engagement
- Science communication podcasting in Brazil: the potential and challeng...
- Using the Tools of Informal Science Education to Connect Science and t...
- Microbiologists’ Public Engagement Views and Behaviors
- Academics’ intention to adopt online technologies for public engagemen...
- Validating a scale that measures scientists’ self-efficacy for public ...
- Communicating Science
- Public Engagement Measurement
- Public Engagement Measurement
- Engaging scientists in science communication: The effect of social pro...
- Processos e desafios da interação entre pesquisa e política na perspec...
- Assessing Public Engagement Outcomes by the Use of an Outcome Expectat...
- Science communication in regenerative medicine: Implications for the r...
- Transferring research from a university to the United Kingdom National...
- Navigating translational ecology: creating opportunities for scientist...
- How Do Science Communication Practitioners View Scientists and Audienc...
- Climate stories: Why do climate scientists and sceptical voices partic...
- Mobilisation for public engagement: Benchmarking the practices of rese...
- Between Vision and Reality: A Study of Scientists’ Views on Citizen ...
- Considerations for effective science communication
- Organisational culture and its role in developing a sustainable scienc...
- “Robots Vs Animals”...
- Ecology on the Runway: Engaging the Public in Unexpected Places
- The reflexive scientist: an approach to transforming public engagement
- Gamification of Apollo lunar exploration missions for learning engagem...
- Preparing Scientists to Be Science Communicators
- Citizen Science Is in the Air – Engagement Mechanisms from Technology-...
- Engaging bioscientists in science communication: Evidence from an inte...
- Analog years: Connecting climate science and agricultural tradition to...
- What Is Public Engagement, and What Is It for? A Study of Scientists’ ...
- Measuring the perceived uncertainty of scientific evidence and its rel...
- Citizens as Scientists...
- From Apes to Whistleblowers...
- Knowledge Translation: Moving Proteomics Science to Innovation in Soci...
- Can Science Writing Collectives Overcome Barriers to More Democratic C...
- Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Enga...
- Meet the Scientist: The Value of Short Interactions Between Scientists...
- Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science
- Motivating Engagement
- Not Communicating science? Aiming for national impact
- Aiming for long-term, objective-driven science communication in the UK
- Safe and Sound? Scientists’ Understandings of Public Engagement in Eme...
- Engaging scientists: An online survey exploring the experience of inno...
- Communicating through humour: A project of stand-up comedy about scien...
- Scientists, the Media, and the Public Communication of Science
- What are you saying? Challenges and opportunities for increasing visib...
- How to win friends and influence people: climate scientists’ perspecti...
- Climatologists’ Communication of Climate Science to the Agricultural S...
- Mapping Public Engagement with Research in a UK University
- A Socioenvironmental Shale Gas Controversy...
- What do scientists think about the public and does it matter to their ...
- Climatologists’ patterns of conveying climate science to the agricultu...
- Scientists' views about communication training
- Mystery Shopping: An Innovative Method for Observing Interactions With...
- How UK psychiatric geneticists understand and talk about engaging the ...
- A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role a...
- To Crowdfund Research, Scientists Must Build an Audience for Their Wor...
- What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science rese...
- Diferencias entre áreas científicas en las prácticas de divulgación de...
- Engaging With Strangers and Brief Encounters...
- The how and why of societal publications for citizen science projects ...
- Public participation processes related to nuclear research installatio...
- Scientific Outreach: Toward Effective Public Engagement with Biologica...
- A more social science: barriers and incentives for scientists engaging...
- Organizational Influence on Scientists’ Efforts to Go Public...
- Narratives of Science Outreach in Elite Contexts of Academic Science
- Reaching “An Audience That You Would Never Dream of Speaking To”: Infl...
- Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological...
- How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are se...
- A critical evaluation of science outreach via social media: its role a...
- A Field of Expertise, the Organization, or Science Itself? Scientists’...
- Predicting scientists’ participation in public life
- Predictors of Knowledge-Sharing Behaviors Among Community-Based Natura...
- Media orientation of German university decision makers and the executi...
- How scientists view the public, the media and the political process
- Toward a Model of Scientists’ Public Communication Activity...
- Situating the Communicative Methodology of Research in the Context of ...
- Knowledge exchange: A comparison of policies, strategies, and funding ...
- How broad are our broader impacts? An analysis of the National Science...
- Portal to the Public: Museum Educators Collaborating with Scientists t...
- Not Such Strange Bedfellows: Underserved Public Audiences as Collabora...
- Measuring the Impact Values of Public Engagement in Medical Contexts
- Barriers and Opportunities for Integrating Social Science into Natural...
- A vision for Open Archaeology
- Policies and practices in supporting scientists' public communication ...
- An exploration of the collaborative processes of making theatre inspir...
- Start-ups among university employees: the influence of legitimacy, hum...
- How Academic Biologists and Physicists View Science Outreach
- ‘Younger People Have Like More of an Imagination, No Offence’: Partici...
- Challenge of Integrating Natural and Social Sciences to Better Inform ...
- Effectively embedding science communication in academia: a second para...
- “Oh Yes, Robots! People Like Robots; the Robot People Should do Someth...
- Barriers and Incentives to Engagement in Public Policy and Science-bas...
- The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on News About Science and Sc...
- Gender Differences in Scientists’ Public Outreach and Engagement Activ...
- Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science p...
- Which indicators for the new public engagement activities? An explorat...
- The mobilization of scientists for public engagement
- Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research
- Using the Internet to Promote Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Rev...
- [minus]plastic: influencing pro‐environmental attitudes among Singapor...
- Meaningful Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
