The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20230424062046/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1075547008320520?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.4
Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 1, 2008

Meaningful Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology: What Would it Really Take?

Abstract

Citizen engagement in scientific and technological issues is in vogue in recent years, and a variety of projects intended to engage citizens in science and technology is occurring worldwide. However, few academics and governments attempting to “engage in engagement” are clear about their goals and desired outcomes, and whether or not the processes they facilitate are likely to meet these ends. What are the goals—explicit and implicit—of institutionally sponsored projects that aim to engage lay citizens in science and technology? Are these exercises likely to meet these goals? and what kinds of processes could nurture more meaningful engagement, what are the barriers to this kind of engagement, and how might these barriers be overcome? Based on the experience of the authors, this article explores these questions and provides 10 recommendations for more meaningful engagement of citizens in science and technology.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Barney, D. (2006). The morning after: Citizen engagement in technological society. Techne, 9(3), 23-31.
Blok, A. (2007). Experts on public trial: On democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 163-182.
Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, experts and the environment: The politics of local knowledge. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.
Gavelin, K., Wilson, R., & Doubleday, R. (2007). Democratic technologies? Final report of the nanotechnology engagement group (NEG). London: Involve.
Goven, J. (2003). Deploying the consensus conference in New Zealand: Democracy and de-problematization. Public Understanding of Science, 12, 243-440.
Grunig, J.E., & Grunig, L.A. (2001). Guidelines for formative and evaluative research in public affairs. A Report for the Department of Energy Office of Science.
Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the "new" scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36, 299-320.
Kleinman, D. L. (Ed.). (2000). Science, technology, and democracy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Kleinman, D.L., & Powell, M. (2007). Science literacy and civic engagement: Learning from a consensus conference. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Science communication for all (Vol. 151, pp. 398-409). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kleinman, D.L., Powell, M., Grice, J., Adrian, J., & Lobes, C. (2007). A toolkit for democratizing science and technology policy: The practical mechanics of organizing a consensus conference. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 27, 154-169.
Petersen, A., Anderson, A., Wilkinson, C., & Stuart, A. (2007). Nanotechnology, risk and society. Health, Risk & Society, 9, 117-124.
Poliakoff, E., & Webb, T.L. (2007). What factors predict scientists' intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication, 29, 242-263.
Powell, M., & Kleinman, D.L. (2008). Building citizen capacities for participation in techno-scientific decision making: The democratic virtues of the consensus conference model. Public Understanding of Science, 17, 329-348.
Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L.J. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29, 88-121.
Seifert, F. (2006). Local steps in an international career: A Danish-style consensus conference in Austria. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 73-88.
Taylor, P.L. (2007). Rules of engagement. Nature, 450(7167), 163-164.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the SAGE Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: September 1, 2008
Issue published: September 2008

Keywords

  1. citizen engagement
  2. nanotechnology
  3. lay citizens
  4. science and technology

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

History

Published online: September 1, 2008
Issue published: September 2008

Authors

Affiliations

Maria C. Powell
University of Wisconsin, Madison, [email protected]
Mathilde Colin
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Science Communication.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 973

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 90 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 93

  1. A systematic literature review of K-12 environmental Citizen Science (...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The role of crowdfunding in endorsing responsible open innovation for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Perceived behavioral control as a moderator: Scientists’ attitude, nor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Public engagement for social transformation: Informing or Empowering?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Engaging Users for Participating in a European Data Collection Campaig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Small-scale release of non-gene drive mosquitoes in Burkina Faso: from...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Juggling Roles, Experiencing Dilemmas: The Challenges of SSH Scholars ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. “Where Does the Science Go?”: An Ethnographic Study of Chemistry PhD S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. ICT, citizen engagement and the governance of extractive resources in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Science Teachers’ Professional Development about Science Centers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. The role of epistemic beliefs in predicting citizen interest and engag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The Value in Science-Art Partnerships for Science Education and Scienc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Preferences for Nuclear Power in Post-Fukushima Japan: Evidence from a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Meaningful collaboration for responsible innovation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Toward an organic policy sociology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Q-method as a tool to facilitate meaningful public engagement with sci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Engaging tourists as citizen scientists in marine tourism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Scientific societies’ support for public engagement: an interview stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Making the invisible visible
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Exploring the impact of game framing and task framing on user particip...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Partizipative Hochschulkommunikation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Interrogating Innovation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Protocols for Stakeholder Participation in Social Marketing Systems
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Analytical chemistry as a tool for suppressing chemophobia: an introdu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Communicating Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Applying Citizen Science to Freshwater Ecosystem Restoration
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Old Media, New Media, and Public Engagement With Science and Technolog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Lessons and Future Challenges
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Engagement in public relations discipline: Themes, theoretical perspec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. A Rubric to Evaluate Citizen-Science Programs for Long-Term Ecological...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Contrasting the Views and Actions of Data Collectors and Data Consumer...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource man...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Getting Out of Their Way: Do-It-Yourselfers, Sensing, and Self-Relianc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Citizen Science Is in the Air – Engagement Mechanisms from Technology-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Old Media, New Media, and Public Engagement with Science and Technolog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. How Might Crime-Scripts Be Used to Support the Understanding and Polic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. What Is Public Engagement, and What Is It for? A Study of Scientists’ ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Recruitment and Retention of Volunteers in a Citizen Science Network t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Reducing microbiological risk in the kitchen: piloting consensus confe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Citizen Science: Toward Transformative Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Creating Inquiry Between Technology Developers and Civil Society Actor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Can Science Writing Collectives Overcome Barriers to More Democratic C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Mapping the hinterland: Data issues in open science
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  45. The Public Face of Economics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Tweeting Taksim communication power and social media advocacy in the T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Na...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Public perceptions of design options for new nuclear plants in the UK
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Education, communication, and science in the public sphere
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Investigating public perceptions of carbon dioxide utilisation (CDU) t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. A system design framework for the integration of public preferences in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Technology knowledge and governance: Empowering citizen engagement and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Governance of genetic biocontrol technologies for invasive fish
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Transformative learning approaches for public relations pedagogy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Decision Support Systems and Consensus Building: The Case Study of the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Science Communication and Desalination Research: Water experts' views
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  60. Public Engagement in Prioritizing Research Proposals: A Case Study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. A “Sense of Place” in Public Participation in Scientific Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. e-Democracy: Exploring the Current Stage of e-Government
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. e-Democracy: Exploring the Current Stage of e-Government
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. Influencing governance of a public-private partnership in plant genomi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  65. Genetically modified animals from life-science, socio-economic and eth...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. DuPont and Environmental Defense Fund Co-Constructing a Risk Framework...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Challenging the One-Way Paradigm for More Effective Science Communicat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): rethinking civil ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Communicative Aspects of the Public-Science Relationship Explored...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encoun...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Database Research: Public and Private Interests
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. The Mirage of Citizen Engagement in Uncertain Science: Public attitude...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. The integration of citizens into a science/policy network in genetics:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. A Provocation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. Risk communication and citizen engagement: what to expect from dialogu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Nanotechnology as an experiment in democracy: how do citizens form opi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Engaging citizens...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Gender Differences in Scientists’ Public Outreach and Engagement Activ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Imagining Ordinary Citizens? Conceptualized and Actual Participants fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy: What Do...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Public Engagement with Emerging Issues in Agri‐Food Nanotechnology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Book Review: Sabrina McCormick Mobilizing Science: Movements, Particip...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Anti-genetic engineering activism and scientized politics in the case ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Getting Cancer Research Into the News: A Communication Case Study Cent...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Community Engagement to Facilitate, Legitimize and Accelerate the Adva...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. Science education and democratic participation: an uneasy congruence?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Media(ted)discourses and climate change: a focus on political subjecti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Preface
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. Difficult Data: Boundary Dynamics, Public Engagement and Bridging Tech...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Participatory Paradoxes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Science and Technology Policy and Ethics
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub